Thursday, August 2, 2018

TRUTH not HYSTERIA - WILL SET US FREE! - (PART 2) Opening Vatican Doors 1981-2013 - TO - REPRESSED Homosexual PRELATES - “Murderous Mayhem” & “Cold-blooded Killer” - REACTION FORMATION - Obsessive Antigay Crusade & Condemning Gay ADULT Pornography & Vatican’s Decades Secret Gay Sexual Acting Out Sandals - All Leading to Benedict XVI Retiring | Global - Structural Violence Atrocities ¿¿¿ Culpability ???

Update: August 16, 2018

The continuation of:

Update: July 29, 2018

Opening (PART 1) Vatican Doors 1981-2013 - TO - REPRESSED Homosexual PRELATES - “Murderous Mayhem” & “Cold-blooded Killer” - REACTION FORMATION - Obsessive Antigay Crusade & Condemning Gay ADULT Pornography & Vatican’s Decades Secret Gay Sexual Acting Out Sandals - All Leading to Benedict XVI Retiring | Global - Structural Violence Atrocities ¿¿¿ Culpability ???

Pictorial Review of PART1

Peace Prayer of St. Francis 
You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.   You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.
Deuteronomy 5:8-10

Teacher, which commandment in 
the law is the greatest?” 
He said to him, 
“‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and 
with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ 
This is the greatest and first commandment. 
And a second is like it
‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ 
On these two commandments hang 
all the law and the prophets.”
Matthew 22:36-40

“A new command I give you: Love one 
As I have loved you, 
so you must love one another. 
By this everyone will know that 
you are my disciples, 
if you love one another.”
John 13:34-35

Hitler's 1930s EXPLOITED Homophobia 
An INSIDIOUSLY Effective Political Weapon

Flawless - Reproductions 
Manufactured Globally Exclusively
By the Vatican 1981-201_

Vatican Doors Were Open To
Over 30 years 
Curia & Hierarchy 
Reaction Formation
US Catholic bishops find pornography more important than poverty

Curia and Hierarchy
Divas on tour”

U.S. bishops approve statement that calls pornography 'mortal sin’ 
Nov 18, 2015 
by Lee McIntyre 

Federico Finchelstein

Curia and Hierarchy

Only Bad for Believers? Religion, Pornography Use, and Sexual Satisfaction Among American Men - January 2018 The Journal of Sex Research 

Perceived addiction to Internet pornographyand psychological distress: Examining relationships concurrently and over time.

Curia and Hierarchy
Sexual Hypocrisy

Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret.”

Secrets of the Vatican
March 2014
Transcript FRONTLINE | PBS
ROBERT MICKENS, Vatican Correspondent, The Tablet: I came here when I was a seminarian in 1986. And I remember I had this very wide-eyed idea of the Vatican, of these holy cardinals and holy men. And I was shocked within a matter of weeks, months, at the careerism, at the sexual innuendo, the— just the whole kind of non-holy life I hadn't expected.
VATICAN GUIDE: [through interpreter] A large part of the hierarchy is homosexual. Certainly, at the top levels of the church, in the Curia, and many important people, such as bishops and archbishops, are gay.
NARRATOR: He's a Vatican guide who says he's had relationships with several priests.
VATICAN GUIDE: [through interpreter] Here in Rome, it's very easy to meet a gay priest, on a bus, in a church, and important churches like St. Peter's. It's even easier when you go to gay clubs and gay bars. You see them in the bars, and then at the altar the following Sunday… Read more:

1500s - 2000s
Gay ADULT Pornography
Male Nude Muscular Models
Vatican’s Over 300 MALE Nudes 
Male Nude Muscular Prostitutes

Michelangelo's Last Judgment figures 'based on male prostitutes
12 Nov 2010
The muscular figures in Michelangelo's Last Judgment fresco in the Sistine Chapel were based on male prostitutes he encountered in homosexual bathhouses and brothels, an Italian art historian has claimed…
Read more:

Michelangelo: Naked Truths?
A recently published study by a researcher at Pisa University suggests that Michelangelo may have based some of the figures in his fresco The Last Judgment, in the Sistine Chapel, on visits to contemporary Roman bathhouses
Read more:

At Vatican, Nude Art Is Too Much to Bare : Sistine Chapel: Some private parts will stay private after restoration.
November 27, 1993

To help to supply some rationale for those who may become hysterical about the above research regarding where Michelangelo found nude muscular male models for his fresco of the Last Judgment “covering the whole altar wall of the Sistine Chapelwhere else would an artist in the 1500s find nearly 300 nude muscular male models? Where else would an artist find 300 nude muscular male models to pose for free - for over a period of 4 years, which is the length of time it took Michelangelo to complete his world renowned fresco of the Last Judgment? Can you imagine the over 300 US Catholic bishops obsessed with condemning pornography - gay ADULT pornography - posing nude for a period of four years as artist models for a fresco of the Last Judgment? It would certainly never become a world renowned fresco? It is a ghastly thought even to attempt to imagine! 

History of Sexual Repression 
Repeating Itself
US Catholic Bishops

"Having No Foundation or Basis In Fact" Just Hysteria 
Arrogance & Idiocy

of the

 nudity symbolized
But during the Renaissance 
that changed, 
for the first time a
naked body was "dirty."

When did 
become offensive?

In 1518, Biagio da Cesena, appointed the Papal Master of Ceremonies, he was so outraged [hysterical] by Michelangelo’s violation of the Sistine Chapel, deeming his work “more suitable for public baths or taverns.” In response - Michelangelo painted, Cesena into the Last Judgment, as Minos, including donkey ears and a snake biting his no-naked area. He painted Cesena, as the judge of the underworld.
Photo links below:

The Italian 
fig leaf campaign
…For decades the Renaissance had signified freedom from restraint, but some of the more traditional clergy felt that artists had crossed a moral line by bringing nakedness into chapels and churches. Biagio da Cesena, the Papal Master of Ceremonies was so outraged by Michelangelo’s violation of the Sistine Chapel, deeming his work “more suitable for public baths or taverns,” that the artist Daniele da Volterra was hired to cover the Sistine Chapel’s nudes with breeches of leaf and loincloth. 
  Meanwhile the northern Catholic Council of Trent was so irate that they insisted numerous works be covered up with strategically placed loincloths or biblically-inspired fig leaves, thus instigating a counter-reformation. The fig leave campaign had begun, but it didn’t just impact paintings and frescoes.  
Statues and sculptures faced censorship too but for these three-dimensional works new solutions were needed. Fig leaves of all shapes and sizes were carved, cast and molded for famous Renaissance figures. Some were loosely attached with hooks, able to be removed or affixed as required. Some were molded on and others still were permanently attached, damaging sculptures irrevocably. And the materials varied too with plaster and bronze fig leaves being some of the most common. Some sculptures even had their genitals chiseled off, negating the need for a fig leaf and rendering them impotent forever.
Some artists rebelled against the crack down. Michelangelo cast clerical critic Biagio da Cesena as Minos, judge of the underworld, painting him with donkey ears as revenge and setting him in a corner of his Last Judgement for all to see. Some simply had their work painted over, covered up or even replaced as in the Adam and Eve panels of the Ghent Altarpiece by Jan van Eyck which were substituted in the 1800s with panels showing clothed figures. And others had their works permanently disfigured with brass loincloths or fig leaves attached that can never be removed…

When did penises become offensive?
And who covered them up?
Once, when religious art was young, nudity symbolized purity. But during the Renaissance that changed, and for the first time a naked body was "dirty."
Where did this notion come from? Who started it? And who decided to cover up every penis in the Vatican?…
Read more:
1500s - 2000s
Problem Lies With 

“…if you look at this painting and all you can see are naked bodies, and all you can see is pornography, the problem is you, not me?”

How the Sistine Chapel spawned a public relations nightmare
Jan 26, 2016 - IDEAS.TED.COM
When Michelangelo’s ambitious paintings premiered in the sixteenth century, they touched off a very modern-sounding social media scandal, says art historian Elizabeth Lev.
It was called a “sin,” a “stew of nudes” that could “weaken the faith of others.” In the years following the debut of Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel paintings in the mid-1500s, a torrent of complaints about the works’ rampant, joyful nudity rocked the global Catholic Church.  
The criticism — from patrons, critics and even popes — may sound like the last gasps of Medieval prudishness, but to Vatican Museums art historian Elizabeth Lev (TED Talk: The unheard story behind the Sistine Chapel), the Sistine Chapel scandal marked a new era of viral opinion-making, powered by Europe’s growing crop of printing presses. And like the latest “hot take” from the TV news, these reactions were often shaped by an echo chamber of critics. The unveiling of the artwork of the Sistine Chapel, Lev says, has all the familiar beats of the modern-day social media scandal…
One artful critic can inflame a continent. 
“The guy who really gets all of this started,” says Lev, “he’s quite the troublemaker, is a man named Pietro Aretino. He’s got a great turn of phrase, he’s funny.” Aretino could also be downright ferocious in his critique of Michelangelo’s The Last Judgment wall fresco, writing that it “makes such a genuine spectacle out of both the lack of decorum in the martyrs and the virgins, and the gesture of the man grabbed by his genitals, that even in a brothel, these eyes would shut so as not to see it. It would be less of a sin for you not to believe than by believing in this manner, to weaken the faith of others.” Incidentally, Aretino had his own kinks, Lev says. “Aretino is a famous, and I mean famous, writer of pornography.”…
A sly response to all would-be censors. 
It seems Michelangelo weathered the scandal in silence. At least there’s no record of his response in the printed materials from that period, though he did use his painting to take a subtle strike at one of his critics, the papal courtier Biagio da Cesena.“We see Michelangelo lose his temper for a second and paint in the guy at Minos the judge of Hell.” The demon is depicted with its tail wrapped twice around Cesena. “So if you have the tail wrapped around your waist twice, it means you’re going to Hell for being lustful, and doesn’t that suggest to you that what Michelangelo was proposing is that if you look at this painting and all you can see are naked bodies, and all you can see is pornography, the problem is you, not me?”…


Male Nude 


Bathhouses and Brothels

Only Bad for 
For BELIEVERS - who ignore the science on homosexuality like the US Catholic Bishops and the majority of the members of the curia and hierarchy. They commit the BREACH that Pope Benedict XVI sternly warns us to avoid causing.   

Science +

+ Religion = Truth = LOVE

Is Some Homophobia 
University of Rochester, April 2012

The Eyes Have It: Sex and Sexual Orientation 
Differences in Pupil Dilation Patterns 
August 3, 2012 PhotoPhoto
Without the facts of science on homosexuality - the remarks made by people obsessively condemning Gay ADULT Pornography (same-sex marriage, etc., etc., etc.) for well over 30 years - only exposes their own deep sexual thoughts and desires. This is how everyone know that the majority of the US Catholic Bishops are repressed homosexuals. They are constantly sexual aroused by Gay ADULT Pornography - they are forcefully trying (unconsciously) to suppress their gay sexual orientation - that science has proven that it cannot be suppressed - no more than we can suppress our hearts from beating or our breathing. Study the science on homosexuality and stop harming yourselves and very young children globally. Start looking for the plank in your own eye before self-righteously attempting to condemn pornography. The US Catholic Bishops are only fooling themselves and looking damn silly in the process. THE BREACH!!! People in the 1500s did not have the science on homosexuality that we have had beginning in 1957.  Why does the Roman Catholic hierarchy always tend, for centuries - continue to be so stupid regarding human sexuality??? It seems that once they are ordained they begin to believe that they are brilliant!!!  Even though they still are unable to walk on water! This is why the people they are condemning on earth Jesus tells us are getting into heaven long before they do, if they do. Pornography is not a mortal sin, but their constant condemning pornography is. The US Catholic Bishops (including members of the curia and the hierarchy around the world) have things twisted around (the meaning of love twisted to mean the opposite) the effects caused by their BREACH!!! Just as Pope Benedict XVI has stated.

U.S. bishops approve statement that calls pornography 'mortal sin'

Catholic bishops find pornography more important than poverty
Dec. 4, 2015 
Pope Francis’ emphasis has been on “a poor church for the poor” and the church as a “field hospital.” But the agenda of the American bishops at their annual meeting in Baltimore last month was business as usual, with a focus on abortion, same-sex marriage, religious liberty and, especially, pornography….
Read more:

US Bishops 
Formalized Yet Another Statement Without Science 

The US Catholic Bishops formalized a statement on pornography not based on authoritative SCIENCE. They based their statement on junk science and myths. Without true science their convictions are essentially projections of their own unacknowledged sexual thoughts and desires. Their statement and those who are fiercely supportive of their statement against pornography - is like they are undressing in public. It seems more like their forceful cry for help. The absence of true science is the breach in their dialogue between science and religion regarding pornography that both John Paul II and Benedict XVI emphatically warned against. Benedict XVI warns that when this breach occurs there is no truth and the meaning of love becomes so twisted around the it comes to mean the opposite. In the midst of their fierce anti-porn mob hysteria  - we are witnessing this twisting around of love to hate. What has become twisted around is their condemnations made against pornography is a condemnation of their own sexual thoughts and desires. Marty Klein Ph.D. has challenged the use of junk science and myths in the fanatical crusades against pornography with real science:

...Armed with conviction and no real data, activists have shifted the narrative from ‘porn is immoral’ to ‘porn is dangerous ... to everyone’ (p. 26). Klein systematically and forcefully debunks one myth after another, citing research where there is any, and gives numerous examples of activists overlooking facts in the interest of promoting their agenda as they stand in the way of funding actual research on the effects of pornography. 
…Klein cites data demonstrating that the rates of rape, divorce, suicide and child sexual exploitation have all actually decreased since porn flooded America, while acknowledging that some people do indeed have trouble managing their porn use... 
Read more:

It is important that before beginning or supporting such hysterical anti-pornography crusades to first follow what Jesus has stated about removing the plank in our own eyes before attempting to remove the speck in our brothers and sisters eyes. Failing in following through with Jesus's command results in the question of Who’s condemning Whom? Yet another example of the result of twisted thinking caused by the BREACH of the absence of science on homosexuality. 

Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your 
brother's eye and pay no attention to the 
plank in your own eye? How can you 
say to your brother, 'Brother, 
let me take the speck 
out of your eye,
'when you yourself fail to see the 
plank in your own eye? You hypocrite,
 first take the plank out of your eye, and 
then you will see clearly to remove 
the speck from your brother's eye. 
Luke 6:40-42

Refusing to follow this command of Jesus - renders our behavior as being self-righteous that Jesus warns us Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God ahead of you (Matthew 21:31).”  

This Breach of 
US Bishops’ 
Absence of Science
Ignores the Warning 
Benedict XVI 

“Any BREACH in 
comes only at 
an enormous price to 
human development…”

US Bishops' Breach  Continues to Create an 
Social Environment
Ready for Use e.g.

Nazis Unleash Vicious Attack on Roman Catholic Church
Chicago Daily Tribune: - May 29, 1937 Photo

Hitler's 1930s EXPLOITED
An INSIDIOUSLY Effective Political Weapon  
Killing 70 Million People by the End of World War II

Flawless - Reproductions 
Manufactured Globally Exclusively
By the Vatican 1981-201_

 “If you continue in my word, you are truly 
my disciples; and 
you will know 
the truth, 
and the truth will 
make you 
John 8:31-32

Will Set Us Free NOT 

John Paul II & Benedict XVI gives Us the recipe to find Truth - it comes from the light of Reason/Science and Faith/Religion in Dialogue that we learn the true meaning of love.

Science +

+ Religion = Truth = LOVE

Reaction Formation Against Porn
Those who advocate against the dangers of sexual arousal fear their own desires 
David J. Ley Ph.D. - May 25, 2014
In May 2014, a Chicago-area Catholic priest was arrested, allegedly for exposing himself to other adults at a gas station. He turned himself in after he was identified by the license plate on his car. Even now, I imagine the man is sitting in a police station, tormented by his actions, in agony for his mistakes. I sympathize with the pain he must feel, and his fear of the rejection, judgment and scorn he will surely experience from his Church and congregation.
The irony of his hypocrisy is made worse by the monsignor’s recent campaign against the seductive, insidious and “addictive” dangers of Internet porn. The clergyman has written and spoken publicly about how Internet pornography, so readily accessible to teens on their phones and computers, causes neurochemicals changes in their brains, and warps the young people’s ideas of sex, love and intimacy:
“One huge concern is the personal isolation that porn creates. It is such a fake form of intimacy and love, it does the absolute opposite of fulfilling each person’s need for intimacy and love. ... There are great negative effects on people on a social, personal, family and relational level.
“It is just a lie, a false presentation (of love and intimacy) … Many, if not most, kids are starting to get addicted.”
He went on to suggest that the crisis of Internet pornography was something that parents, congregations and communities needed to act on, because “Kids ages 11 to 17 are the highest consumers of pornography, according to recent statistics.”
This man’s well-meaning but destructive campaign was based on misconceptions, driven by fear, probably his own fears, of the power that sexual arousal has in his life and that of others. Porn isn’t addictive, it doesn’t change one’s brain, and children under 17 are definitely not the highest consumers of pornography. Porn isn’t addictive, but perhaps fear is.
As an advocate against the sex/porn addiction industry, I am regularly challenged with fear-based rhetoric, that porn and sex can lead people to dangerous, destructive, frightening sexual acts…
reaction formation is a psychological concept, whereby a person with a strong, uncomfortable desiredevelops an even stronger, exaggerated, public stance against that secret, shameful desire. Shakespeare knew this human dynamic, when he wrote in Hamlet, “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
Mark Foley is a former US House Representative, who was a political leader against child pornography, homosexuality and sex offenses against children. He resigned from the House after revelations of a scandal involving a young male page and Foley’s inappropriate communications with the young man. Ted Haggard is an American minister, who preached against homosexuality and exhorted his congregations to support anti-gay legislations. Haggard was later exposed as engaging in homosexual relationships, and even later identified himself as bisexual. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich castigated President Bill Clinton’s infidelity during impeachment proceedings, while Gingrich himself was having an affair
Read more:

Only Bad for Believers? Religion, Pornography Use, and Sexual Satisfaction Among American Men
January 2018The Journal of Sex Research 
Research has often demonstrated a negative association between pornography use and various intrapersonal and relationship outcomes, particularly for men. Several recent studies, however, have suggested that 
the negative association between pornography use and these indicators is stronger among more religious Americans, suggesting that moral incongruence (engaging in an activity that violates one's sacred values) and the attendant shame or cognitive dissonance, rather than the pornography use per se, may be the primary factor at work. 
The current study tested and extended this theory by examining how religion potentially moderates the link between pornography use and sexual satisfaction in a national random sample of American adults (N=1,501). Analyses demonstrated that, while pornography use was negatively associated with sexual satisfaction for American men (not women), among men who rarely attended religious services or held a low opinion of the Bible, this negative association essentially disappeared. Conversely, the negative association between frequency of pornography consumption and sexual satisfaction was more pronounced for men with stronger ties to conventional religion. These findings suggest that the connection between pornography use and sexual satisfaction, especially for men, 
depends largely on what viewing pornography means to the consumer and their moral community, and less so on the practice itself.
Read more:

Perceived addiction to Internet pornography and psychological distress: Examining relationships concurrently and over time.
In the United States, Internet pornography use is a common behavior that has risen in popularity in recent years. The present study sought to examine potential relationships between pornography use and well-being, with a particular focus on individual perceptions of pornography use and feelings of addiction. Using a large cross-sectional sample of adults (N = 713), perceived addiction to Internet pornography predicted psychological distress above and beyond pornography use itself and other relevant variables (e.g., socially desirable responding, neuroticism). This model was replicated using a large cross-sectional sample of undergraduates (N = 1,215). Furthermore, a 1-year, longitudinal follow-up with a subset of this sample (N = 106) revealed a relationship between perceived addiction to Internet pornography and psychological distress over time, even when controlling for baseline psychological distress and pornography use. Collectively, 
these findings suggest that perceived addiction to Internet pornography, but not pornography use itself, is uniquely related to the experience of psychological distress.
Read more:

The problem with ADULT pornography resides within the person who is hysterical doing the condemning, NOT in the gay ADULT pornography, as research has found. They are hysterical, because they cannot offer any substantiated reasoning equal to their extreme condemnation of ADULT pornography. From research observations - I have witnessed a whole group of educated adults become hysterical over the thought of pornography without any factual evidence concerning the type of pornography. It was amazing to see whole group of adults revert immediately to pre-adolescence behavior, acting like children. In an instant, they all lost their rational thinking and became hysterical - together they exposed all their sexual problems. Who needs sexual education? We need to start with adults! Of course, this is not true of all adults. Hysteria gets the attention! This sexual hysterical POST-TRUTH era - starts with the curia and hierarchy - the repressed homosexuals! They need to get a grip on the knowledge, science on human sexuality and the their individual sexuality, because their sexual hysteria is harmful to children growing up having lifelong last effects - as displayed by their behavior. Sexual Hypocrisy!

United States Conference of 
Catholic Bishops
Myths and Junk Science about Pornography
Corrosive Effects of Pornography
“Create in Me a Clean Heart: A Pastoral Response to Pornography
"Wash Me Thoroughly": Healing from Pornography Use and Addiction

United States Conference of
Catholic Bishops'




(e.g. Talk Of The Town 1942 movie)



Luke 6:40-42

Will Set Us Free NOT

John Paul II & Benedict XVI gives Us the recipe to find Truth - it comes from the light of Reason/Science and Faith/Religion in Dialogue that we learn the true meaning of love.

Science +

+ Religion = Truth = LOVE

His Porn, Her Pain: Confronting America’s Porn Panic with Honest Talk About Sex, 
By Marty Klein Ph.D. 
Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2016
Book Review: Journal of Porn Studies 1/25/17
Klein traces the history of how ‘every new technology has been adapted for sexual purposes’ which ‘provokes even more anxiety about the strange new technology, and so these cycles of technological innovation are almost always followed by outrage and fear’ (p. 6). He describes how ‘introducing the option of unlimited, free, high-quality, highly varied pornography’ into a ‘volatile mix of ignorancefearangersexual dissatisfactioncuriosity and sexual cravings’ (p. 15) created a perfect storm of completely predictable results. The principal factor that Klein identifies is what he describes as a ‘PornPanic’ promoted by moral guardiansself-appointed or otherwise: ‘That mess ... that PornPanic ... is still with us’ and ‘drives public policy, influences parenting, supplies the media’s narratives, and encourages millions of marital quarrels every year’ (p. 16). 
Klein separates fact from fiction as he chronicles the manufacture of this PornPanic which shapes the cultural narrative about sex in general, and pornography in particular. Claims made by the anti-porn activists are systematically rebutted. For example, he cites research which indicates that porn addiction and sex addiction do not actually meet the criteria for true addiction. Key changes in physical function, symptoms of withdrawal and continuing use when the activity is no longer pleasurable do not occur and thus, Klein argues, it is hard to take this claim seriously. 
The assertion that ‘Neuroscience proves that watching porn can damage the brain (especially in the young) and even cause porn addiction’ is countered with reports that similar changes are seen in the brains of ‘people cuddling puppies, enjoying sunsets and watching porn. Neuroscientists do not claim that watching porn does anything, this is the work of activists citing ambiguous reports of neuroscientists, which lay people aren’t trained to evaluate’ (p. 30). 
Armed with conviction and no real data, activists have shifted the narrative from ‘porn is immoral’ to ‘porn is dangerous ... to everyone’ (p. 26). Klein systematically and forcefully debunks one myth after another, citing research where there is any, and gives numerous examples of activists overlooking facts in the interest of promoting their agenda as they stand in the way of funding actual research on the effects of pornography. 
…Klein cites data demonstrating that the rates of rape, divorce, suicide and child sexual exploitation have all actually decreased since porn flooded America, while acknowledging that some people do indeed have trouble managing their porn use. Most critically, it is often not the porn itself that is the problem, but another issue in a relationship. Partners who will not or cannot moderate their behaviour are the focus of the therapy, not the porn…
Read more:

Marty Klein Ph.D.
Psychology Today

His Porn, Her Pain: Confronting America’s Porn Panic with Honest Talk About Sex, 
By Marty Klein Ph.D.
Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2016. 208p.
“Written by an award-winning author and veteran sex therapist, this practical, innovative, and often passionate book addresses the explosion of pornography use, advises couples on defusing conflict about it, guides parents in helping their kids deal with it, advises people concerned about their use of it, and shows how honest talk about sex can resolve America’s “porn panic.”
This book eases readers’ minds as Klein addresses common concerns and debunks common myths while identifying what we should be concerned about. Most importantly, the author explains how we can heal America’s obsession with porn by engaging in honest talk about sex—something he knows is neither simple nor easy. The text includes sample conversations to help adults talk to each other about pornography, and suggestions for parents on how to talk to their kids about porn—healthy discussions to help their kids develop “Porn Literacy.” This book offers honest, thorough, expert information desperately needed by a nation of people driven to panic about pornography.

Provides the only book to discuss and resolve conflicts about pornography without demonizing porn or porn users
Confronts a common source of conflict in marriage and anxiety in parenting—and presents innovative, practical ways to resolve these problems using down-to-earth language
Shows why there’s no such thing as “porn addiction,” explains why it really matters what we call it, exposes the billion-dollar industry behind this failed concept, and offers real insight and hope for people concerned about their involvement with pornography
Shows how new technologies are always adapted for sexual purposes—making the Internet’s application to pornography a technology issue as much as a sexual issue
Identifies—and corrects—the most common myths and junk science about pornography
Describes the politics through which progressive feminists and the Religious Right have wound up in bed together opposing pornography—by re-branding porn from an immorality problem to a public health crisis
* * * * Explains how America’s lack of real sex education and frank talk from adults leaves young people looking at porn for sex information—and what they’re actually learning from it
* * * * Explains how America’s lack of real sex education and frank talk from adults leaves young people looking at porn for sex information—and what they’re actually learning from it
Relieves parental anxiety with easy-to-follow advice on talking with kids about porn, including conversations about youth “sexting”
Appeals to general readers: educators, psychologists, clergy, and social workers; and policymakers, scholars, students, and researchers in psychology, law, public policy, communications, and media studies.”
From Publisher’s Website.

Below an excerpt from:

latency Fixation

It speaks volumes - especially noting what strongly appears to be a symptom of repressed homosexuals and that is a fixation at the latency stage of psychological development  ( This fixation, in brief, has to do with their inability to come to terms with and be accepting of their God given sexual orientation, a phenomenal process for any type of sexual orientation that for them - from all observations would be homosexual. The decades of their intense obsessive antigay crusade - is a key indicator. Their inability to be accepting of their gay sexual orientation prevents them from advancing onto the maturational developments in adolescence and on into adulthood (Psychoanalytic Approaches to Trauma: A Forty-Year Retrospective - Henry Krystal - PDF - Read more:

Immature Love Relationships
Condemning Gay People 
Gay ADULT Pornography 

End of the above excerpt.

In the end who cares where Michelangelo found his nude muscular male models? People are people - we are all in need of God's saving grace! What makes any of us to think that we are any better than a prostitute? Better to think again! It is extremely self-righteous for us to think that we are better. How many personal lives of prostitutes do you know, their history, their struggles, their pain, their hopes and dreams, etc.? Jesus expressed great love for prostitutes. Jesus warned us stating “Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God ahead of you (Matthew 21:31).”  People are people - all are in need of God's saving grace. Pope Francis knows people - because he has spent decades walking his feet off going out to meet and talk to people - all kinds of people. No one can fake that kind of knowledge, because we are changed for life by everyone we meet in depth personally. There is a reason why people around the world like Pope Francis and it is likely the reason why Michelangelo's Last Judgment fresco is world renowned.

Curia and Hierarchy
Sexual Hysterical 

“Why do you look at 
the speck of sawdust in 
your brother’s eye 
and pay no 
to the plank 
in your own eye? 
How can you say to your 
brother, ‘Let me take 
the speck out of 
your eye,’ 
when all the time there is 
plank in your 
own eye? 
You hypocrite
first take the plank 
out of your own eye, and
  then you will see clearly to
 remove the speck from 
your brother’s eye.
Matthew 7:3-5

America’s Sexual Hypocrisy Addiction  
June 23, 2015  
For the 
Curia's and Hierarchy's
Time For Writing
In the Sand

The teachers of the law and the Pharisees
brought in a woman caught in adultery
They made her stand before the group 
and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this 
woman was caught in the 
act of adultery. 
In the Law Moses commanded us to stone
such women. Now what do you say?”
They were using this question as 
a trap, in order to have a 
basis for accusing 
him. But Jesus 
bent down and started to write on the
ground with his finger. When they 
kept on questioning him, he 
straightened up and 
said to them, 
Let any one of you who is without sin be
the first to throw a stone at her.” 
Again he stooped down and 
wrote on the ground.
At this, those who heard began to go away
one at a time, the older ones first, 
until only Jesus was left, with the 
woman still standing there.
John 8:3-9

Curia and Hierarchy 
Repressed Homosexuals 
“Murderous Mayhem” 
Hate & Anger

Early Childhood Antigay 
Recreating the 
Nazi Regime 
Organizational Culture
Globally - Today 
¿¿¿ Culpability ???

The cruelties of Structural Violence on 
are often 
and even 
regarded by many people as natural or 

NAZI !!!

Benedict XVI
born 1927

Heinrich Himmler: On Homosexuals 

The first homosexual rights movement seems to have originated in Germany in the late 19th century. For many years an academic journal - the Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen - was published and Germany had an active gay movement. This movement was ended when the Nazis, besotted with notions of racial purity and genetic deviants, took control. So absolute was there destruction of the gay movement that it was not known about in the post war years until the mid 1970's. It is important to recognised that the typology of the fetid and infectious homosexual preceeds the AIDS epidemic. 

"Anyone who thinks of homosexual *love* is our enemy. We reject anything which emasculates our people and makes it a plaything for our enemies, for we know that life is fight, and it is madness to think that men will ever embrace fraternally"
Heinrich Himmler, 14 May 1928

"I wish to explore a few ideas on the subject of homosexuality. Amongst certain homosexuals there exists the following point of view: "what I do is of no importance to anyone else, it is a personal and private matter". Everything which touches upon sexual matters ceases to be private when the life or death of a nation depends on it. It is the difference between world domination or annihilation.
A nation with many children can gain supremacy and mastery of the wordl. A pure race with few children already as one foot in the grave; in fifty or a hundred years it will be of no significance; in two hundred years it will be extinct. It is essential to realise that if we allow this infection to continue in Germany without being able to fight it, it will be the end of Germany, of the Germanic world. Unfortunately this is not the simple matter it was for our forefathers. For them, the few isolated cases were simply abnormalities; they drowned them in bogs. Those who found bodies in the mire did not know that in 90% of the cases they found themselves face to face with a homosexual who had been drowned with all his belongings. This was not punishment, more the simple elimination of this particular abnormality. It is vital we rid ourselves of them; like weed we must pull them up, throw them on the fire and burn them. This is not out of a spirit of vengeance, but of necessity; these creatures must be exterminated. 
Heinrich Himmler, 18 Feb 1937 
Read more: - Fordham University

Pope - Saving Humanity from Destruction of Homosexuals & Transsexuals
December 22, 2008
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Pope Benedict said on Monday that saving humanity from homosexual or transsexual behavior was just as important as saving the rainforest from destruction… Read more:

Rainforest & Homosexuals

Christmas greetings to the members of the Roman Curia and Prelature (December 22, 2008) | BENEDICT XVI

Late 1920s-1930s
Used the charge of
Political Opponents

Persecution of Homosexuals
…It should be noted that Nazi authorities sometimes used the charge of homosexuality to discredit and undermine their political opponents. Charges of homosexuality among the SA (Storm trooper) leadership figured prominently among justifications for the bloody purge of SA chief Ernst Röhm in June 1934. Nazi leader Hermann Göring used trumped-up accusations of homosexual improprieties to unseat army supreme commander Von Fritsch, an opponent of Hitler's military policy, in early 1938. Finally, a 1935 propaganda campaign and two show trials in 1936 and 1937 alleging rampant homosexuality in the priesthood, attempted to undercut the power of the Roman Catholic Church in Germany, an institution which many Nazi officials considered their most powerful potential enemy…Read more:
Curia & Hierarchy
Nazi’s Tactic
Accusations Homosexual
To Attack &
Remove Opposition
Character Assassination
Secretary of State Cardinal Bertone &
Gianmaria Vian, editor of the Vatican newspaper,
orchestrating plot against Dino Boffo
Cardinal Camillo Ruini
Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco
Read more:

Cold-blooded killer
 of the good name of our colleagues and confrères”
Pope Francis Christmas Address to the Curia 
December 22, 2014

You know when you are seriously ruffling the feathers of the  
H O M O P H O B I C  
divas of the RC curia and hierarchy - the “Murderous Mayhem” of 
Repressed Homosexuals - with TRUTH - Restoring the Dialogue between Science and Religion on Homosexuality and therefore restoring true LOVE
depending on how severely damaging their character assassination tactics are that they used against you, e.g. Mr. Cruz. They have over played their hand, because they have been in the Vatican palace's closets too long.
It is time to take them out to court - civil court!!!

Repetition of Nazi Themes
Vatican’s Teachings 
a Phenomenon, 
a Disease, a Plaque,
Innate/Intrinsic - “Disordered" "Destruction of Mankind"
N O N S E N S E!!!
¿¿¿ Culpability ???

Curia and Hierarchy
Criminal Negligence
Gay People 
Symptoms Resulting 
of the Catholic Church
¿¿¿ Culpability ???

Onset of Puberty
"a BUMPY ride"
LGBT Adolescents 

The issue of homosexuality was 
“not so much the elephant in the room but 
herd of elephants”
for the Catholic Church…

¿¿¿ Culpability ???

Repressed Homosexual Prelates

“From Fascism to Populism In History” 
Federico Finchelstein

by Lee McIntyre 
Read more:

 Traumatic vs Loving

*  *  *  *  *
Early Childhood
Traumatic Memories

The Compulsion to Repeat the Trauma
Re-enactment, Revictimization, and Masochism
Bessel A. van der Kolk, MD
Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 
Volume 12, Number 2, Pages 389-411, June 1989

far more severe than in "BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN

December 26, 2008 – 
Fr. Marty Kurylowicz

Posted below:

Lasting & Life-debilitating 
Early Childhood
Memory of 
Hate & Brutal Violence

Ennis's Traumatic Early Childhood Memory Scene - Video

Powerful, Enduring & 
Memory of 
"was the time that distant summer on Brokeback when Ennis had come up behind him and pulled him close, the silent embrace satisfying some shared and sexless hunger." Video 

Begins here:

Lifelong - Harmful 
Early Childhood Years 
E X P O S U R E 
Homosexuals & 
Brownshirts & Catholic Clergy
The Traumatic Child Abuse
of Benedict

When children at a young age suffer from abuse there is the tendency for the child to blame and to punish himself or herself for being abuse, this is not true of an adult who suffers through a horrific event(s). Both Pope Benedict XVI and Pope John Paul II suffered through the atrocities of Hitler and Nazi regime, however, John Paul was 19 years when the Nazi invaded Poland in September 1939 and Benedict was born and raised through the rise and fall of Hitler. An adult is developmentally is able better able to process and reason through horrific events. This is not true for a very young child. A very young child does not have to understand what is happening to be traumatized. A child can easily be traumatized by listening to parents or adults discuss the horrific events taking place. In brief, as stated above - Benedict’s father being a policeman who was a diehard anti-nazi opponent who tried to reign in the Nazi violent Brownshirts SA (Stormtroopers) that caused his father’s demotions and forcing the family having to move several times before the age of 10, would have cause lifelong symptoms similar to those of domestic violence. “Very young children – even as young as babies and toddlers – can become “stressed out” or traumatized when their developing sense of trust is threatened by repeated exposure to violence as well as other events such as a serious car accident or losing a trusted caregiver(” 

It is likely from the birth of Benedict 1927, his family was in turmoiled due to the violence of the Brownshirts the first 10 years of his life until his father retired from the police department in 1937. It is more than likely that Benedict raised in this contentious traumatizing home environment from infancy onwards that he would have over heard or heard directly the historical events of the Brownshirts, their violence recounted by his father’s who, as a policeman, would have had first hand knowledge of these events. His father would have recounted Hitler’s and Himmler’s dehumanizing tactics (the same used against the Jewish people), first portraying homosexuals- as less than human and followed by caricaturizing them in ways - as a threat to the Germany race and then falsely accusing the Brownshirts of being depraved homosexuals that was all highly publicized by Joseph Goebbels the minister of Nazi propaganda. What Benedict was not told was the truth that the dehumanization of homosexuals and the accusation that the Brownshirts were predominantly homosexuals were all LIES. They were lies manufactured by Hitler, Himmler and Goebbels for the intended purpose to be used as a "smoke scene” to justify Hitler’s massacre of the Nazi political opponents, in the "Night of the Long Knives" lasting from June 30 and July 2, 1934. The historical research of Andrew Wackerfuss, 2015, also verifies that the Brownshirts were not predominantly homosexuals. At the same time that Benedict was being exposed to the false accusations of the Brownshirts being filled with deprave homosexuals  - he was also being expose to the same false accusations that the Catholic Church was filled with depraved homosexuals. 

Night of the Long Knives, in German history, purge of Nazi leaders by Adolf Hitler on June 30, 1934. Fearing that the paramilitary SA had become too powerful, Hitler ordered his elite SS guards to murder the organization’s leaders, including Ernst Röhm. Also killed that night were hundreds of other perceived opponents of Hitler.
Benedict, from infancy to the age of 10 years old was exposed daily to the dehumanization statements against homosexuals and the unsubstantiated claims that homosexuals are a threat to the existence of the German people and to children. All were lies - but a child believes whatever he hears from adults as sacred as if coming from God. If the child is traumatized these false statements become embedded and forgotten in the child unconscious mind. This child as an adult will likely have long forgotten the traumatic situation(s) connected to these false statements about homosexuality and will believe these false statements to be true that they are innate, as if coming from God. These innate feelings, such as homosexuality is evil, need to be challenged by the dialogue between science and religion. Benedict’s childhood situation is extreme to say the least.

Nazis Unleash Vicious Attack on Roman Catholic Church
Chicago Daily Tribune: - May 29, 1937 Photo

Exploiting Societal Homosexual Prejudices 
Hitler - Staged 
immorality trials’ 
Against Catholic Clergy

Hitler continued to the use of the same propaganda exploiting the German’s antigay prejudices that he used against the Brownshirts - to launch another ruthless and lethal campaign accusing the outspoken anti-nazi opposition of the Catholic clergy of being depraved homosexuals arranging highly publicized “immorality trials” from 1935 to 1937.  
A History of Christianity, 
by Owen Chadwick, 1996
   …In July 1933 pope Pius XI shocked the democratic world by signing a concordat with Hitler, which was very favorable to the rights of the Catholic churches in the German states. The Nazis had no intention of keeping this agreement and gradually move towards outright 'repression; the stage persecution of monks for homosexuality, with the maximum of publicity. In 1937  Pius issued an encyclical, Mit brennender Sorge (‘With burning anxiety’), in which he listed all the breaches of the concordat committed by the Germans (   p 254)."

Hitler. 1936-1945: Nemesis 
Ian Kershaw 2001
…The stranglehold that the Churches maintained over the values and mentalities of large sections of the population was an obvious thorn in the side of a Movement with its own highly intolerant ‘world-view’, which saw itself as making a total claim on soul as well as body. The assault on the practices and institutions of the Christian Churches was deeply embedded in the psyche of National Socialism…
At the same time, the activists could draw on the verbal violence of Party leaders towards the Churches for their encouragement. Goebbels’s orchestrated attacks on the clergy through the staged ‘immorality trials’ of Franciscans in 1937 – following usually trumped-up or grossly exaggerated allegations of sexual impropriety in the religious orders – provided further ammunition. And, in turn, however much Hitler on some occasions claimed to want a respite in the conflict, his own inflammatory comments gave his immediate underlings all the licence they needed to turn up the heat in the ‘Church struggle’, confident that they were ‘working towards the Führer’. 
Hitler’s impatience with the Churches prompted frequent outbursts of hostility. In early 1937, he was declaring that ‘Christianity was ripe for destruction’ (Untergang) , and that the Churches must yield to the ‘primacy of the state’, railing against any compromise with ‘the most horrible institution imaginable’…However, he indicated that at some point in the future Church and state would be separated, the Concordat of 1933 between the Reich and the Vatican dissolved (to provide the regime with a free hand), and the entire force of the Party turned to ‘the destruction of the clerics (Pfaffen)’…
Addressing the Gauleiter in mid-March, Hitler announced that he wanted ‘no ordinary victory’ over the Churches. Either one should keep quiet about an opponent (totschweigen), or slay him (totschlagen), was how he put it. In April, Goebbels reported with satisfaction that the Führer was becoming more radical in the ‘Church Question’, and had approved the start of the ‘immorality trials’ against clergy. Goebbels noted Hitler’s verbal attacks on the clergy and his satisfaction with the propaganda campaign on several subsequent occasions over the following few weeks…
Read more:        Photo

Paradoxes of Benedict XVI
1968 Tubingen
Marxism - Student Revolts
“deeply alarmed”
 "traumatic memory" 
Flashback 1930s Brownshirts

Dec. 19, 2008
“Christians fight poverty out of a recognition of the supreme dignity of every human being, created in God’s image and destined for eternal life.”

Dec. 22, 2008
Benedict “…followed this with a Christmas sermon denouncing gay marriage, insisting that gays and lesbians were turning their backs on the “essence of the human creature” and denying “their nature.”

Rainforest & Homosexuals
Christmas greetings to the members of the Roman Curia and Prelature (December 22, 2008) | BENEDICT XVI

Benedict throughout his early childhood years had been 
subjected to nearly daily to unbelievable antigay violence that would been traumatizing beyond belief though physically he remained untouched. I would speculate that his strong close family love protected him from completely falling apart and that much of the emotional traumatizing affect was suppressed into his unconscious mind. And there it remained dormant until the late 1960s while he was teaching theology along with his colleague and friend Swiss Catholic theologian Hans Kung at the University of Tübingen, after he was appointed to the chair of dogmatic theology - the Marxist leaning students began rioting seemed to have triggered a flashback awakening for Benedict, in part possibly portions of the traumatic memories of the riots of the Brownshirts during his early childhood years growing up in Nazi Germany - along with memories of the Nazis dehumanizing tactics homosexuals. This flashback was a major turning point for Benedict that caused a significant and lasting change in his behavior. This type of behavior is not unusual for people who suffered through the atrocities of the Holocaust to have a delay onset of a traumatic reaction, in midlife. People are not often cognizant of the trauma that children suffer from exposure to violent situations i.e. war, terrorist attacks, etc., especially if the child becomes a pope. We are not even cognizant of our own the childhood traumas and these unidentified traumas will disruptively play themselves out in our everyday lives. They are our disruptive ghosts in our lives. When we are able to identify them, acknowledge them and grieve through the pain they represent - we are then able to move on to live a fuller life. It is the speck and the plank process. We cannot help others through situations that we have not worked through ourselves, personally. For repressed homosexual members of the curia and hierarchy this means facing the truth about your gay sexual orientation.

E.J. Dionne: Pope Benedict’s legacy is one of paradox - Feb.11, 2013
…The student revolts of 1968 deeply alarmed him. “At the time,” he wrote, “I was dean of the faculty of theology at [the University of] Tubingen, and in all the university assemblies in which I participated, I could notice all kinds of terror, from subtle psycho-terror up to violence.”
He described how he initially regarded Marxism as a possible corrective to certain strains of modern thought. But he came in the late 1960s to identify it with “terror.” He added: “I think that in those years, I learned where discussion must stop because it is turning into a lie and resistance must begin in order to maintain freedom.”…
The paradoxes of Benedict — and perhaps of Catholicism itself — were visible in two statements he made atChristmastimeProgressives could only welcome an op-ed piece he wrote for the Financial Times on Dec. 19 in which he declared that “Christians fight poverty out of a recognition of the supreme dignity of every human being, created in God’s image and destined for eternal life.”
Yet he followed this with a Christmas sermon denouncing gay marriage, insisting that gays and lesbians were turning their backs on the “essence of the human creature” and denying “their nature.”
Read more:

The Pope: Journey from liberal to conservative
12 February 2013
…Joseph Ratzinger - as he was known before his election - has lived a life of surprises.
…But the most important surprise of his career was his transformation from revolutionary to conservative in the 1960s.
In 1962 Pope John XXIII summoned the bishops of the world to the Second Vatican Council. He wanted to open up the Roman Catholic Church to the 20th Century, and the Council introduced a wide-ranging set of reforms. It replaced the Latin mass with worship in local languages, emphasised the Church's duty towards the poor, and, for the first time, the Church recognised a universal right to religious freedom.
St Peter's Basilica was transformed into a makeshift parliament for the Council debates, which were conducted in Latin. Joseph Ratzinger was there as a "peritus", or theological adviser, working for Cardinal Frings, the Archbishop of Cologne and one of the leading modernisers.
With a reputation even then for formidable intelligence, the young Father Ratzinger helped draft some of the key speeches with which Cardinal Frings swung the meeting behind the reformers.
In an interview many years later, the future Pope said that he had then believed that the old theology "had to get out of its armour. It also had to face the situation of the present in a new language, in a new openness".
A greater freedom, he argued, also had to arise within the Church.
In 1966, just after the end of the Council, Joseph Ratzinger took up a new academic position at Tubingen University, which was at the time the flagship of liberal theology in Germany. So when student revolutions convulsed Western Europe and the United States two years later, he was a first-hand witness.
The experience changed his life. Years afterwards he recalled the "traumatic memory" of a group of theology students at Tubingen who put out a flier claiming that "the New Testament is a document of inhumanity, a large scale deception of the masses", and asking "so what is Jesus's Cross but the expression of a sado-masochistic glorification of pain?
Prof Ratzinger, as a German who had grown up in the 1930s, understood all too well what a totalitarian regime could do. He saw a new left-wing totalitarianism at work in the revolutionary spirit of the 1960s.
"It is true I saw a new spirit creeping in," he said. "A spirit in which fanatical ideologies made use of the spirit of Christianity… Here I saw very clearly… that there was anabuse of the Church and the faith, which were used as instruments of power."
He concluded that a return to traditional teaching was the only rational response…
…Although many liberal Catholics were impressed by the gentleness of Benedict's style as Pope - another of his surprises - the conservative views he adopted in the aftermath of the 1960student revolutions had a profound impact on his pontificate.
On most of the sensitive areas of Church teaching - women priests, contraception and homosexuality, for example - he was uncompromising. And he campaigned against what he strikingly called the "dictatorship of relativism" in post-Christian western societies.
But his decision to resign suggests the radical young Fr Joseph Ratzinger is still there in the old Pope Benedict…  Read more:

For Benedict rereading the Vatican’s teaching on homosexuality that Benedict had revised - they sounded more like a form of severe self-punishment - a reaction of being irrationally forced under extraordinary circumstances growing up in Nazi Germany to totally suppress one’s gay sexual orientation and taking blame for it, as abused children do for the being abused, like they were the cause of the abuse. Taking blame for being gay? Another inconsistency is the fact that Benedict is a brilliant man and in his Christmas address December 22, 2008 to the curia he knew the science about the rainforest - Why did he not know the science on homosexuality? 

Why did he think that homosexuals were a threat to all mankind so much so that he felt that mankind needed to be protected from homosexuals? 

How come he felt that it was so necessary to publicly warn people of this looming threat of world doom?

A Terrorized Child's Unconscious Learned NAZIS Behavior?

And why did he not clearly state the word homosexual, instead of making extraordinary coded references to it without stating it? Some people have said it was just his way of secretly attacking gay people and leaving gay people not being able to accused him of doing so. I thought this way also,in the beginning 2008, but not today. It was after rereading Himmler’s public statements on homosexuality that I realized that many of Benedict’s statements almost identically matches those of Himmler (i.e., Heinrich Himmler: On Homosexuals, Fordham University, ( It is a matter of getting in that frame of mind of Himmler's condemnation of homosexuals and staying in that state of mind as you are reading the history of Benedict growing up in Nazi Germany and then viewing everything Himmler stated about homosexuals through the perspective of a child in his early childhood years. Then advancing several decades forward to 2008 that in the absence of any substantiating science, to support what and how Benedict states his thought regarding homosexuality that I realize that the statements he makes are related to childhood fears about homosexuals as he had heard or heard through his father that Himmler or Goebbels made. After, the massacre of the "Night of the Long Knives” 1934, when Benedict was 7 years old, there was a hysteria that broke out to rid the Brownshirts of all homosexuals. The difficulty that the Nazis had regarding homosexuals was that there was no easy identifiable way to pick out homosexual men. That is when the Nazis became obsessive in attempting to identify homosexuals that the Nazis perceived that even a touch, a look at another man was reason enough to classify someone as a homosexual. It got so ridiculous that even if a man said or did nothing to classify him as homosexual - that too was grounds to classify him as a homosexual.  And on the heels of the Nazis obsessive anti-homosexual public hysteria purposely built up to attack the Brownshirts - this national terrorizing attack on homosexuals was immediately followed by the “Nazis Alleging Rampant Homosexuality in the Priesthood (,” both events in the 1930s caught the world’s news media attention. That is when I realized that both events were experienced by Benedict when he was a child between the ages of 7 to 10 years old - that Benedict’s caution in his adult life, at the Vatican 1981-2013, of not referring directly to homosexuality, may have been a terrorized child's learned behavior growing up in Nazi Germany, as well as, his same obsessive terrorized need to rid the Church of any trace or hint of homosexuality.  This would seem to account for Benedict's unconscious (childhood re-enactments) copying the same violence of the Nazis ruthless and deceptive tactics to attack homosexuals. These are the ghosts that exists in the Vatican, along with the ever present - relentless antigay hysteria (Selma Fraiberg, “Ghost in the Nursery”) and that exists in the Catechism of the Catholic Church regarding the unsubstantiated notations on homosexuality due to the absence of any ongoing dialogue with the science on homosexuality. Unconsciously, Benedict commits the breach that he emphatically warns the world not to commit in his encyclical "Caritas in veritate" 2009, a lot of hysteria but no TRUTH and no LOVE.
d y s t h y m i a
and far W O R S T
…Unlike ethnicity, homosexuality is not a characteristic immediately obvious to an observer, and therefore the Gestapo and other Nazi agencies frequently relied upon denunciations received from informers who often possessed a personal grudge against the accused person;…Such summary justice was enabled by changes to Germany’s penal code in 1935 that broadened the scope of Paragraph 175 to facilitate the indictment of as many suspected homosexuals as possible. Previously, the courts had required a relatively high burden of proof: only observed anal intercourse between men was considered a violation of the statute.  After the Nazi revision, however, “very minor sexual intimacies were landing men in concentration camps...In fact, in some cases it was, as a legal commentator of 1944 put it, ‘not necessary that a physical contact has taken place or is even just intended... Read more:

Nazis Alleging Rampant Homosexuality in the Priesthood, 
attempted to undercut 
the power of the Roman Catholic Church in Germany, 
an institution which many Nazi officials considered their 

RC Canon Law 
‘Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’
Radicalization of Prosecution Against Homosexuality

Stripped of his Rights

Legislating Homophobia in the Third Reich: The Radicalization of Prosecution Against Homosexuality by the Legal Profession
Geoffrey J. Giles
German History, Volume 23, Issue 3, 1 July 2005, Pages 339–354

Why Bother About Homosexuals? 
Homophobia and Sexual Politics in Nazi Germany 
Geoffrey J. Giles 
…The whole Aryan race was threatened by homosexuality, and it would spread inexorably, not least through the pernicious efforts of the Jews, who would actively and successfully seek to drag Germans down these perverse paths in their efforts to destroy the German people. The metaphor of homosexuality as a disease that, if unchecked, would reach epidemic proportions, became a staple expression of Himmler’s in later years…The rhetoric within the Party about Jews as homosexual and pederastic perverts took off the following year, with a Völkischer Beobachter article expressing outrage about the appearance of Magnus Hirschfeld to give a speech at a boys’ school.
The charge of pederasty was one also leveled by the Social Democrats in a mutual battle of sexual denunciation centering on Ernst Röhm in 1931. The latter chose to deny the charges, while Adolf Hitler studiously ignored them. Many conservative prosecutors had long felt frustrated over the difficulty they experienced in bringing convictions on charges of homosexuality, if they could not prove penetrative anal or oral intercourse, which was almost impossible to establish if the accused denied it. One of the striking aspects of my research has been the growing evidence that, while homophobia was widespread, it was members of the professions, notably lawyers and physicians, who paved the way for more brutal and official persecution. 
In legal circles, then, a general welcome was accorded to the 1935 revision of §175; it permitted convictions for simple masturbation and indeed even the slightest of homosexual advances. Most historians, noting that the tightening of the law occurred at the end of June 1935, assume that this was some sort of gruesome anniversary gift for homophobes one year after the murder of Ernst Röhm. In fact, the promulgation of the amendment occurred in the context of a much wider criminal code reform that covered a considerable number of other crimes unrelated to the Röhm Purge. The public learnt little about the subtleties of the change, because the Ministry of Justice felt that a clear explanation in the press of the kinds of sexual acts now covered by the law would have the deplorable effect of encouraging young men to experiment. And so the new §175 continued to be vague, stating simply: “A man who commits indecency with another man, or allows himself to be abused by him for indecency, will be punished with imprisonment.” Lesbians remained outside the scope of the law. Reich Justice Minister Franz Gürtner later noted in the discussion of a different clause: “The law is not made just for lawyers. The ordinary reader must be able to recognize what we mean.” Yet it was not possible to tell from the paragraph itself what the law understood to constitute “indecency.” The public assumed that penetration remained the important qualifier toward a criminal act. 
If the wider reach of the revised law was little understood, the public grasped its retroactivity even less. Neither has it been fully understood by historians today. It has been assumed that German courts simply ignored the letter of the law, and applied the stiffer penalties to old offenses arbitrarily. However, the Nazi leadership always liked to give the appearance of acting perfectly legally when they knew they were not, and so it was here. The 28 June 1935 law that changed the penal code addressed in an apparently clear and humane voice the issue of an accused person whose activities spanned the two versions of the law. Yet right down to 1945 men were convicted for isolated incidents of inconsequential sexual horseplay committed sometimes more than fifteen years earlier, when those acts had not been illegal. Paragraph 2a of the amendment law stated: “If at the time of the verdict a milder law is in effect than at the time of the deed, then the milder law may be used.” How could the courts be said to be applying a milder version of the law, when they were convicting men for minor acts that were not even illegal at the time of commission? It was a legal trick. The revised §175 had dropped the provision in the old version that a convicted homosexual could also stripped of his rights as a citizen, including the right to vote. Thus the judge could appear to be magnanimous by not removing citizens’ rights for pre-1935 offenses, when he was in fact using the new law to criminalize what had been perfectly legal sex acts. Nothing in that new §175 suggested what was now going to be covered by the law. It sounded more or less the same, and the Nazi press remained silent…
Read more:



Farewell rites for Archbishop Hunthausen fill Seattle and Helena

August 2, 2018
SEATTLE — The late Archbishop Raymond "Dutch" Hunthausen's  place in church and U.S. history will be tied to his steadfast opposition to nuclear weapons; to his outreach to LGBT, divorced and marginalized people; and to tensions with the Vatican that led to diminution of his episcopal authority.
However, the portrait of the man that emerged from farewell rites filling cathedrals in Helena, Montana, and Seattle was one of a humble spiritual leader dedicated to prayer and the people of God…
Read more:

A Terrorized Child's Unconscious Learned 
NAZIS Behavior
"Most RADICAL Face
of Modern 
"a breathtaking 
Descent into Modern 

Archbishop Asks Rome To Ease Up
 September 28, 1986
MILWAUKEE — Rembert George Weakland long has been regarded by his peers as the brightest member of the hierarchy in the American Roman Catholic Church...has politely but forthrightly told the Vatican to, in effect, soften its drive to coerce doctrinal uniformity by punishing dissenters.
He asserted that Draconian measures used throughout Christian history to silence those who challenge traditional church teaching have resulted in “much cruelty, suppression of theological creativity and lack of growth…”
Bishop Thomas J. Gumbleton of Detroit predicted that the “cruel (and) demeaning” treatment of Archbishop Hunthausen would effectively “intimidate” his fellow prelates…  
…in his columns, titled “The Price of Orthodoxy,” Archbishop Weakland appeared to be directing his remarks to Vatican inquisitors. 
He contended that previous efforts to monitor and safeguard Catholic doctrine have been undertaken in an atmosphere where “amateurs-turned-theologians easily became headhunters and leaders were picked (on the basis of) the rigidity of their doctrine, so that often second-rate and repressive minds, riding on the waves of fear, took over.
“Religion under such circumstances then can become an ideology that tolerates no obstacle and that values ideas more than people…”
Read more:

Conflict in the Catholic Hierarchy : 
a study of coping strategies in the Hunthausen affair
with preferential attention to discursive strategies
by Timothy Peter Schilling - 2003
Conflicts within the Roman Catholic hierarchy poses risks to the organizational effectiveness of the Church, but the hierarchy’s approach to conflict handling has rarely been subjected to systematic, empirically grounded study...

Perspective Shift…tries to frame the discussion of Hunthausen’s leadership within one particular set of strictly intraecclesial perspectives (the perspectives of the “human sciences” are excluded), Hunthausen invites his audience to (re)consider the same question according to the perspective of the Church “come of age” in the world. Hunthausen also seeks a perspective shift when he asks his hearers to evaluate the “justice” of Church procedures according to the standards of civil law…

 September 18, 1986 
America's Roman Catholic bishops have largely been silent about the dramatic decision by the Vatican disciplining one of their colleagues,Archbishop Raymond G. Hunthausen of Seattle, because they are caught in a dilemma involving their own authority…
…Those bishops who have spoken have generally been measured in their response…But a few expressed anger, with Bishop Thomas J. Gumbleton, an Auxiliary Bishop in Detroit, using surprisingly strong terms such ''cruel'' and ''demeaning'' in describing the Vatican's treatment of Archbishop Hunthausen. 
Bishop Gumbleton said the Vatican's action would ''intimidate'' the American bishops. Fear of Intimidation 
' 'They'll always be looking over their shoulder to see who's watching and afraid to speak or act,'' he said. ''It's a serious loss if every bishop is afraid to act out of his own faith commitment, but only act on the basis of what he thinks somebody else wants him to do.'' …
…While the charges against Archbishop Hunthausen have only been phrased in the most general terms, conservative critics have accused the Seattle Archdiocese of an overly generous policy on marriage annulments, of permitting churches to use altar girls, and of tolerating too frequent use of a general absolution of sins rather than individual confession. ArchbishopHunthausen also permitted the use of his cathedral for a mass by Dignity, an organization of homosexual Catholics
But many bishops, liberally interpreting Vatican guidelines, have condoned similar departures in their dioceses. Thus, many bishops believe that the action against Archbishop Hunthausen reflects the continuing effort by the Vatican, as in the Curran affair, to pressure the American bishops into greater allegiance to orthodox Catholic teaching. Conservatives Pleased… 
…The bishops who have spoken out critically are those whose view of the church is a more diverse and democratic one, who believe that decisions by the Vatican should be made in consultation with the American bishops more familiar with the nuances of Catholic life here. 
''It certainly strikes me from a distance as being part of the effort to centralize, to control,'' said Bishop Leroy T. Matthiesen of Amarillo, Tex., in a telephone interview…

June 12, 2015
SEATTLE – John McCoy followed the tumultuous story of Seattle Archbishop Emeritus Raymond G. Hunthausen for years, as a Seattle journalist and later as an archdiocesan spokesman.
Now McCoy has written “A Still and Quiet Conscience: The Archbishop Who Challenged a Pope, a President, and a Church,” a biography of the man he considers the “quintessential Vatican II bishop.”…
Read more:

M e a n i n g 

Activist in the Chancery
America Magazine - September 22, 2015
John McCoy, an excellent writer, tells an insider’s account of the public humiliation of Archbishop Raymond Hunthausen of Seattle [“A Still and Quiet Conscience: The Archbishop Who Challenged a Pope, a President, and a Church,”]…
…The Vatican seemed unimpressed that, under Hunthausen’s leadership, Seattle exceeded the national average on Mass attendance, adult conversions to the church and monetary contributions by some 20 percent… 
…Beginning in the late 1970s Hunthausen began to speak out and protest against the buildup of nuclear weapons, especially the Trident submarine, harbored near Seattle. He showed up at a protest in 1978 but stated, “I’m here out of my own personal conviction. Not here as the archbishop.” Later, as the Reagan administration built up the nuclear arsenalHunthausen publicly stated that he was withholding his taxes and giving them to charity “in resistance to nuclear murder and suicide.” 
Unfortunately for Hunthausen, a kind of entente cordial grew between the Reagan administration and the Vatican. Reagan recognized the Vatican diplomatically and gave information to Vatican officials about the Communist bloc. Many in the Reagan administration (especially Catholics, including Reagan’s secretary of the navy, secretary of state, director of the C.I.A., and national security advisor) asked Cardinal Ratzinger to make an example of one of the U.S. bishops who was anti-war. The Vatican sent Cardinal James Hickey of Washington, D.C., as an apostolic visitor. Hunthausen was accused of alleged liturgical abuses, inability to enforce church law, laxity in allowing annulments to marriages, being soft on abortion and being too lenient toward homosexuals (the diocese had allowed a Dignity Mass in the cathedral)… 
Notably, Hunthausen was one of the first archbishops to deal forthrightly with the clergy abuse issue. He turned over priest pedophiles to the law and said, in a letter to all his priests sent in 1988, that he would name pedophile priests and asked the priests to follow procedures if a victim came forward. Jason Berry, the first journalist to break the priest pedophile story, said, “Hunthausen was the first archbishop to deal with this problem publicly. The fact that Hunthausen spoke out and was so forthright—you cannot overestimate that!” 
Hunthausen was investigated, punished and humiliated. He had no official legal representation, no right of appeal, no due process or access to the report of the allegations made against him to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
Read more: 

Curran: Papacy should admit some of its teachings are wrong 
Nov. 21, 2014
Shortly after October's extraordinary Synod of Bishops on the family concluded in Rome, NCR asked Fr. Charles Curran, the Elizabeth Scurlock University Professor of Human Values at Southern Methodist University in Dallas and a noted moral theologian, for his impressions. Following is the text of the interview.
NCR: What pleased you most about the synod?
Curran: The fact that bishops and cardinals publicly disagreed with one another in their attempt to discern what is good for the church. We have really not had this experience since the open debates of the Second Vatican Council. The one negative aspect about all this was that the press was not allowed into the synod itself to hear the actual discussion, but only found out about the discussions after the fact.
What disappointed you most?
The fact that not only did the synod not change any teaching in the church, but even those who were in favor of pastoral change insisted they were not changing the teaching of the church. This came through especially in the debate about full participation in the Eucharist for divorced and remarried Catholics. In my judgment, we have to change some of our specific moral teachings with regard to sexual morality…
You have written that Catholic theology is "act-based" and not "intention-based," as you would like it to be. How did we get to this act-based theology? What's wrong with this approach?
…The problem with the Catholic approach is using the nature of the faculty as the criterion for discovering whether an act is right or wrong. One can never see the power or faculty of sexuality apart from the human person and the human person apart from one's relationship to other persons. Thus, for example, for the good of the person or the good of the marriage, one could and should at times interfere with the procreative purpose of the sexual faculty. In the same manner then, one could justify homosexual relations and unions on the basis of what is good for the human person and the human person's relationships
Read more:

The Charles Curran Case: From 
March 29, 1986
The Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, after having reviewed the matter with the Holy Father, has written the Rev. Charles E. Curran a letter dated Sept. 17, 1985, to inform Father Curran that he can no longer teach Catholic theology in the name of the church unless he retracts certain positions having to do mostly with sexual morality. Since the threatened loss of Father Curran's theology professorship at The Catholic University of America is similar to a controverted censure previously imposed on the Rev. Hans Kung, there is sure to be concern within much of the American theological community. This is all the more true because many moralists, including Father Curran, regard his positions as well within the mainstream of present-day Catholic theology. Even a preliminary review of the principal issues in this case reveals their potential for causing disruption within the American Catholic community unless they are addressed with both clarity and charity.
Dissent from authoritative but noninfallible teaching of the church.This is the crux. If a teaching is not infallible. Father Curran maintains, dissent from it is in principle possible, and in certain circumstances justifiable. In fact, he came to be known in 1968 as spokesman for theologians who dissented from the teaching of Humanae Vitae that artificial contraception is always evil. Cardinal Ratzinger disallows that dissent, as well as certain other of Father Curran's positions that he says vary from the church's authoritative, noninfallible teaching on homosexuality, masturbation, premarital sex, abortion and euthanasia. The Cardinal cites Vatican II's "Constitution on the Church" (No. 25), which calls for "submission of mind and will" to teaching of this sort, and also Canon 752 of the new Code, which incorporates the thought of Vatican II on the matter. But to see how inconclusive citations can be, one has only to read the commentary of the Canon Law Society of America on c. 752: "Dissent is possible because the teachers mentioned in the canon [Supreme Pontiff and College of Bishops] can be and de facto have been mistaken.”…
Read more:

“If you continue in my word, you are truly 
my disciples; and 
you will know 
the truth, 
and the truth will 
make you 
John 8:31-32

Will Set Us Free NOT 

John Paul II & Benedict XVI gives Us the recipe to find Truth - it comes from the light of Reason/Science and Faith/Religion in Dialogue that we learn the true meaning of love. 
Science  + 
+ Religion = Truth = LOVE

   Faith & Reason JPII

1518 appointed the 
Papal Master of Ceremonies
an OUTRAGED  [hysterical] critic of 
- Michelangelo responded by DEPICTING
Cesena, in his Last Judgment” fresco - as the judge of the underworld
with - a snake biting his no-naked area  Photo

Caritas in veritate
    …Truth is the light that gives meaning and value to charity. That light is both the light of reason and the light of faith, through which the intellect attains to the natural and supernatural truth of charity: it grasps its meaning as gift, acceptance, and communion. Without truth, charity degenerates into sentimentality. Love becomes an empty shell, to be filled in an arbitrary way. In a culture without truth, this is the fatal risk facing love. It falls prey to contingent subjective emotions and opinions, the word “love” is abused and distorted, to the point where it comes to mean the opposite. Truth frees charity from the constraints of an emotionalism that deprives it of relational and social content, and of a fideism that deprives it of human and universal breathing-space. In the truth, charity reflects the personal yet public dimension of faith in the God of the Bible, who is both Agápe and Lógos: Charity and Truth, Love and Word…
REASON always stands in need of being purified by faith: this also holds true for political reason, which must not consider itself OMNIPOTENT. For its part, RELIGION always needs to be purified by reason in order to show its authentically human face. Any breach in this dialogue comes only at an enormous price to human development… 
Read more:  Pope Benedict XVI 2007 2009

P h o t o s:
Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler
the fascist leaders of 
Italy and Nazi Germany


by Federico Finchelstein

"POST-TRUTH" by Lee McIntyre 

"Caritas in veritate” Pope Benedict XVI 

"The Body Keeps The Score" - 
Bessel A. van der Kolk
Trauma - emotional brain, becomes very activated, and rational brain, gets deactivated

PhotoEmotional Intelligence photo

The lifelong cost of burying our traumatic experiences
The trauma caused by childhood neglect, sexual or domestic abuse and war wreaks havoc in our bodies, says
Bessel van der Kolk in
The Body Keeps the Score

Brain, Mind, and Body in The Healing of Trauma  with - Bessel van der Kolk MD
…my group and I did the very first neuroimaging study on people having flashbacks. That turned out to be a very interesting study. We discovered that when people relive their trauma, a fair amount of their brain actually goes offline, particularly in the left anterior prefrontal cortex where the capacity for analyzing, understanding, and language is located. So, essentially we were able to visualize how people become dumbfounded... 
...and struck with speechless terror. That is a very big issue. The other thing we discovered or confirmed was that when people relive their trauma, their survival brain, their emotional brain, becomes very activated, and their frontal lobes, their more rational braingets deactivated, so that people sort of “take leave of their senses” in some ways—so that people’s cognitions fail them. We learned that the insula, the part of the brain that’s involved in registering and noting what is going on in your body, becomes impaired, so there’s a decreased body–mind connection that needs to be reactivated. Various people have discovered that the medial prefrontal cortex—the part of the brain that allows you to feel yourselfnotice yourself and be in touch with yourself—gets quite thrown off track, basically, so that it is really hard to notice what goes on inside of you and to manage what goes on inside of you…

Bessel van der Kolk, MD is a world renowned researcher and clinician in the field of traumatic stress. His innovative work to integrate mind, brain, body, and social connections in the healing of trauma has had a profound impact on the care and treatment of trauma victims all over the world. Dr. van der Kolk’s research includes brain imaging studies on trauma’s impact on childhood developmentDr. van der Kolk, a professor in the department of psychiatry at Boston University Medical School, is the founder and medical director of the Trauma Center in Boston and the director of the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN), established by Congress to raise the standard of care and improve access to services for traumatized children, their families and communities. Dr. van der Kolk’s newest book, The Body Keeps The Score: Brain, Mind and Body in the Healing of Trauma (Viking, 2014)—a New York Times Best Seller—offers a sweeping and revolutionary new understanding of the causes and consequences of trauma and how to heal the traumatized brain…

It bears repeating,

Pope Benedict XVI IS 

If you are educated enough: if you have not overdosed on stupid pills, as the global example presented by the majority of the RC members of the curia and hierarchy, who have lost their way - falling victim to populism of the “post-truth” era, disregarding truth overwhelmed by the hysteria of the crowds fantasy about human sexuality - that has fueled their unconscious repressed homosexual fear having become frozen, paralyzed and controlled to follow the flow of the crowd - who are unable or unwilling to activate their rational brain and reverse the trauma - if you are this kind of person - you may be able to begin to understand the unprecedented complex levels of the horrific effects of nazism on a child growing up in Nazi Germany. To think of Benedict as a Nazi - is a way to maintain “the just world” fallacy.  It devalues Benedict as a victim, and it obscures the truth and allows violence to continue. 

Just-World Hypothesis Definition
The just-world hypothesis is the belief that, in general, the social environment is fair, such that people get what they deserve. The concept was developed in part to help explain observations that to preserve a belief that the world is a just place, people will sometimes devalue a victim. A just world is defined as a world in which people do get what they deserve. The just-world hypothesis is important because it suggests that people may treat certain victims badly, oddly enough, out of a desire to sustain their belief in justice…
Read more:

Benedict is a childhood 
extremely traumatized victim 
Nazi inhumanity and barbarity 
in human history.

This form of childhood traumatization the effects of which are tightly hidden in the unconscious mind, however, there tends to be a continuous unconscious re-enactment that takes place throughout the person’s lifetime. It is an unconscious attempt to try to make sense of a traumatizing event(s) until a time in the future, if ever that the early childhood trauma can be safely identified, acknowledge and accepted by the victim. 

Through Benedict’s unconscious re-enactments of the tactics of Hitler’s radical barbarity, specifically surrounding the understanding of homosexuality, that like Hitler’s radical dehumanization of the Jewish people gave license to the Nazi regime that unleashed ever more radical forms of dehumanizing barbarity - Benedict unconsciously opened the Vatican’s door to the same. Their disrespect for the science on homosexuality mirrored an example to the world that as Benedict describes in his letter, Caritas in veritate, - the absence truth empty’s love of its meaning - to be arbitrarily filled till the meaning of love is so twisted around that it comes to mean the opposite - and worst it is past off as God’s love, e.g. Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone like the Nazis falsely claimed homosexuals molest children, and Cardinal Burke calls gay people the same as murders. For over 30 years, they were and still are major contributors to shaping and fueling, on many different levels, to the “post-truth” era of a form of populism. It ignored the aspects of reason, logic, science and clung to the emotional hysteria of their repressed homosexual fear. They have fallen victim to the phenomenon known as GROUPTHINK. For proof of this curia and hierarchical idiocy of “post-truth” just look at who the US bishops chose to send to the synod on youth this October 2018 i.e. Chaput.  Chaput's continuous insistent to avoid “hot button” issues like gay marriage  is more clearly his attempt to repress his own homosexual erotic feelings and thoughts. Chaput’s chronic antigay statements demonstrates the meaning of reaction formation, which has been the typical attitude shared among the majority of the US prelates. Is there any wonder how and why they fuel the “post-truth” era? No one seems the least concerned that Chaput is not at all a safe person to send to the synod on youth??? 

Mary McAleesey
Youth Synod

If anyone was serious in the curia and hierarchy about truth, love and our youth we would send the  FORMER PRESIDENT OF Ireland, Mary McAleese. McAleese cares about LGBT youth, she has more knowledge, wisdom, spirituality not to mention her stills as a president than any member of the curia and hierarchy - beside she is a real mom - about relating and understanding youth. Asking McAleese to take the place of Chaput - would create more good will and credibility about the synod on youth. However, she would have to be granted an equal voice on all aspects of the synod. 

Outspoken archbishop takes the reins in Philly - September 8, 2011
Chaput is also likely to have a higher profile in the East Coast media market, and receive greater scrutiny for his frequent remarks and writings on issues like gay marriage (“The issue of our time,” he says), abortion rights and what he calls the perilous American drift into secularism and moral relativism.
In a crucial swing state with a bevy of Catholic voters, Chaput told The Associated Press on Tuesday that if Catholic politicians who support abortion rights “don’t believe what the church teaches, they’re not really Catholic.”
Those are the kind of remarks that have dismayed more progressive Catholics who say Chaput and other bishops should worry more about pastoral concerns than politics, especially given the ongoing sexual abuse scandal… Read more:

To be continued... 
   Fr. Marty Kurylowicz

* * * * *


The Eucharist is our “reservation” for Heaven: Jesus leads us on our journey towards eternal life.

More than anything else, the life of a Christian is a grateful response to a generous Father.

Charity is the most effective form of witness, because in it people see the love of God.

Every Church member has a responsibility to become holy, by taking care of others.

Before helping others, we need to have a personal encounter with God: we need time to pray and to listen to His Word.
Pope Francis

* * * * *



Gay. Straight. and the Reason Why: The Science of Sexual Orientation 2011
by Simon LeVay
Neuroscientist Simon LeVay has served on the faculties of Harvard Medical School and the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, and is well-known for a 1991 study in which he reported on a difference in brain structure between gay and straight men. His forthcoming book Gay, Straight, and the Reason Why: The Science of Sexual Orientation examines the evidence that suggests sexual orientation results primarily from an interaction between genes, sex hormones, and the cells of the developing body and brain. In this original post, LeVay explains how he initially reacts to new reported findings in this field.
Read more:

Is Some Homophobia Self-phobia?
University of Rochester, April 2012

The Eyes Have It: Sex and Sexual Orientation 
Differences in Pupil Dilation Patterns 
August 3, 2012 PhotoPhoto

   Faith & Reason JPII

Science  + 
+ Religion = Truth = LOVE

Repressed Homosexual RC Prelates
Absence of 
Science on Homosexuality
Is the breach 
in this dialogue between science and religion that continues to come at an enormous price to human development and to the environment...
To destroy the gay sexual orientation of  a child - is to destroy the development of EMPATHY - destroys LOVE and creates HATE. It is the birthing of POST-TRUTH POPULISM, because this destruction of a child's ability to love is a traumatic experience for the child, who is told that it this violent abuse - is the love of God, according to the Vatican's unsubstantiated (by science or scripture) teachings on homosexuality.
This is how for this child that pleasure and pain feelings get switched around, where the child for life is fearful of what is pleasant and feels safe only with what is painful (Henry Krystal, Integration and Self Healing: Affect, Trauma, Alexithymia, 1993). 
Their BREACH renders them ‘hysterical’ unlawful Church authority, who are disproportionally overwhelmed over gay ADULT pornography that is found to be authoritatively  harmless - to the complete exclusion to those who are considered to be the least among us, who are suffering the most in the world. They are unlawful because they are not built on the truth of Christ and therefore their rulings are not about love and definitely not about justice. History will prove this to be true, especially in this age of social media. “From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked, Luke 12:48-49.”


* * * * *

Lifelong Harmful Effects 
Early Childhood
Growing Up Gay  
Raised In Antigay Social Environments 
Meaning of LOVE Twisted Around 
To Mean The Opposite 

¿¿¿ Culpability ???

THE BREACH - March 11, 2018 - Photos,
ANTHROPOLOGISTS - d e b u n k  
THE BREACH - April 14, 2018 - Photos,
Pupil Dilation Reveals Sexual Orientation - Photo
Autonomic Nervous System - Photo
Trial of Galileo (1633) - Photo
NASA Future Solar System Mission - Photo
NASA - Exploring Climate Change - Photo
Snow Cover and Sea Surface Temperatures NASA - Photo
NASA's Global Climate Change website - Photo

SCIENCE can purify religion from 
error and superstition; 
RELIGION can purify science from 
idolatry and false absolutes. 
Each can draw the other into 
a wider world, 
a world in which both can flourish. 
For the truth of the matter is that 
community will inevitably 
interact; their options 
DO NOT include 

Science + 
+ Religion = Truth = LOVE

REASON always stands in need of being purified by FAITH: this also holds true for 
political reason, which must not 
consider itself OMNIPOTENT. 
For its part, 
RELIGION always needs to be purified 
by REASON in order to show its 
authentically human face. 
Any BREACH in this DIALOGUE comes 
only at an enormous price to 
human development

The Lifelong Harmful Effects
of the 
Curia’s & Hierarchy’s 
Fierce, & Ruthless & Deceptive 
S U P P R E S S I O N 
of the 
Science on Homosexuality 

The Absence vs. Presence of
Parental Love 
Early Childhood Years
e.g. Growing Up GAY


THE BREACH - Antigay Prejudices, Unsubstantiated, Suppression, Repression, Exploitation, Globalization, Annihilation - - NO SCIENCE - - NO TRUTH - - THEREFORE - - - NO LOVE

Related links:

LET’S GET A GRIP!!! - Divide & Separate - A Curia Tactic - PANICKING EXPOSURE - Burke & Lepanto = Denunciation of “GAYS” in the Church and Attacks Threats - UNFETTERED Economic Liberalism

MENTAL HEALTH of "OUT" (Gay Athletes) vs. "REPRESSED" (Curia & Hierarchy) HOMOSEXUALS - - - Winter Olympics 2018 - - - GUS KENWORTHY’S KISS with boyfriend on NBC greeted with acclaim - - - ADAM RIPPON, then LINDSEY VONN, then GUS KENWORTHY - All three DARED to SPEAK OUT critically against the leaders of our country - - - POPE FRANCIS urges YOUTH to go ONLINE and GIVE the Church an EARFUL

Part 4D - NAZI ABUSE OF SCIENCE -> GENOCIDE “RACIAL CLEANSING” & WAR CHILDHOOD -> CURIA - GENOCIDE of HOMOSEXUALS - - Part 4D - Homosexuality - “If it is NOT a choice, if it is NOT a disease, in the perspective of faith it can only be a GIFT” - Bishop Cruz, Brazil - ’seeks to END ‘PREJUDICES that KILL’
Bowlby - Ainsworth - Hazan
The Cradle to the Grave” - Emotional Bond 
Infants and their Caregivers
Adult Romantic Partners 
Read more: Part 4A & Part 4B

Dad and Son walking in rain with umbrella 
Leonid Alfremov -  Oil Paintings
The Absence of 
Parental Love
On Homosexuality
Someday, maybe, there will exist a well-informed, well considered and yet fervent public conviction that the most deadly of all possible sins is the mutilation of a child’s spirit.
Erik Erikson 

Read more: Part 4A & Part 4B

…The forced suppression of a gay child’s sexual orientation during early childhood years growing up —- this is the problem.  This is the absence of parental love that is the problem. It is this heinous form of child abuse that is the problem - supported and promoted by - the negligence of the complete absence of the science on homosexuality in the Catechism of the Catholic Church regarding homosexuality. It kills human bonding that develops human EMPATHY!!! It kills LOVE!!! It promotes hatred - a never ending hatred - gives license - to be as mean as you can be - for as long as you want!!! All because this child was not loved!!! It is the never ending story of child abuse -- the mutilation of a child's spirit!!! Read morePart 4B




Twisted - Isaiah 40:3
Pope Benedict XVI 2009
The Domino Effect of the BREACH
 "at an enormous price to
 human development"
LGBTQ Youth At Higher Risk For Homelessness, Sex Trafficking
Jan 24, 2018 
   …Nationally, about 40 percent of homeless youth identify as LGBTQ. In Springfield, the average is higher - at 55 percent.
    Reynolds says their sexual orientation is most likely the reason they ended up on the streets. Because they need shelter and food, homeless youth are a vulnerable target for labor and sex trafficking.
    …”The biggest target right now is young gay men," said Reynolds.
    It's a situation that can be even harder to spot. For any person looking from the outside, it can look like a normal relationship.
    "A typical scenario would be if a young gay man would go to Martha's and then two or three days later he would tell me that he's been staying at an old gentleman's house," said Reynolds. "And everything was going great for a while, and then the older gentleman started asking for favors in return for staying there. That's sex trafficking."
The situation can escalate and go as far as that person forcing the youth to perform favors for others in exchange for shelter and other goods.
"A lot of the at-risk population that we have are the ones that are engaging in that survival sex, or having to give something in order to have a place to stay, and we would consider that unsafe housing," said Sudduth.
Reynolds says young gay men are also less likely to report.
"That's the last thing they're going to do, is to tell someone that they are being taken advantage of every night by another person," said Reynolds.
Reynolds believes what they are fighting are overwhelming religious implications in the area.
"It's sort of top heavy. There really isn't another answer. It's either this religion or not," she said. "It's difficult to fight that money and that power when that's what existed for so long. It sort of tends to lead a blind eye to what's happening on the underside of society."
"No one chooses to be homeless. No one chooses to be taken advantage of by an older gentleman. No one chooses to be sex trafficked," said Reynolds. "We've got to get past the religion oppression. It cannot matter anymore what you believe religiously, you have to look at them as a human being. It's that simple.”…
Read more:
Sexual Trafficking of LGBTQ Youth in the Americas Photo
Homeless Youth at High Risk of Human Trafficking Photo
American Association of Suicidology Photo

Dr. Caitlin Ryan,
Family Acceptance Project
Documentary, APR 27, 2016,  45:00 - Listen
Michigan Radio NPR - Photo

Homeless LGBTQ Youth and Progressive Churches:
A New Agenda for Care and Justice - Feb 02, 2016 - Photo

Human Trafficking’s High Toll on Homeless Youth
04/18/2017 - Photo


The Presence of 
Parental Love

Written by Diane Warren - to honor her father 
Sung by - Celine Dion

For all those times you stood by me
For all the truth that you made me see
For all the joy you brought to my life
For all the wrong that you made right
For every dream you made come true
For all the love I found in you
I'll be forever thankful baby
You're the one who held me up
Never let me fall

You're the one who saw me through through it all
You were my strength when I was weak
You were my voice when I couldn't speak
You were my eyes when I couldn't see
You saw the best there was in me

Lifted me up when I couldn't reach
You gave me faith 'cause you
I'm everything I am
Because you loved me

You gave me wings and made me fly
You touched my hand I could touch the sky
I lost my faith, you gave it back to me
You said no star was out of reach
You stood by me and I stood tall
I had your love I had it all
I'm grateful for each day you gave me
Maybe I don't know that much
But I know this much is true
I was blessed because I was loved by you

You were my strength when I was weak
You were my voice when I couldn't speak
You were my eyes when I couldn't see
You saw the best there was in me

Lifted me up when I couldn't reach
You gave me faith 'cause you believed

I'm everything I am
Because you loved me

You were always there for me
The tender wind that carried me
A light in the dark shining your love into my life
You've been my inspiration
Through the lies you were the truth
My world is a better place because of you

You were my strength when I was weak
You were my voice when I couldn't speak
You were my eyes when I couldn't see
You saw the best there was in me
Lifted me up when I couldn't reach
You gave me faith 'cause you believed
I'm everything I am
Because you loved me

You were my strength when I was weak
You were my voice when I couldn't speak
You were my eyes when I couldn't see
You saw the best there was in me
Lifted me up when I couldn't reach

You gave me faith 'cause you believed
I'm everything I am
Because you loved me
I'm everything I am

Because you loved me
Diane Warren explained in the book Chicken Soup For the SoulThe Story Behind The Song how she honors her father in this song.

“If you continue in my word, you are truly 
my disciples; and 
you will know 
the truth, 
and the truth will 
make you 
John 8:31-32

Will Set Us Free NOT 

John Paul II & Benedict XVI gives Us the recipe to find Truth - it comes from the light of Reason/Science and Faith/Religion in Dialogue that we learn the true meaning of love.

Science +

+ Religion = Truth = LOVE

St. Francis, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy Photo
Grand Haven Lighthouse Pier Lake Michigan - Photo
‘God Made You This Way,’ Pope Is Said to Have 
old Gay Man, May 21, 2018 - Photo
Chilean bishops offer mass resignation over sex 
abuse scandal, May 18, 2018 - Photo
The Overstimulation of Everyday Life: 1. New Aspects 
of Male Homosexuality
Sidney H. Phillips, M.D., 2002 - Photo 
"Homosexuality: coming out of the confusion”
Sidney H. Phillips, M.D. - Int J Psychoanal
1518 appointed the Papal Master of Ceremonies
- Michelangelo responded by DEPICTING
Cesena, in his “Last Judgment” fresco - 
as the judge of the underworld with - 

The letter dated: July 12, 2017 

Science  + 
+ Religion = Truth = LOVE

July 12, 2017 

Bishop David J. Walkowiak
Bishop of the Grand Rapids Diocese
360 Division Avenue S., 
Grand Rapids, MI 49503-4501

Dear Bishop David, 

I received your letter dated October 2015, that included a request to set an appointment to dialogue with you. At the time, my commitments,obligations and lack of financial means did not permit me to follow through. Furthermore, the around trip from Canton, MI to Grand Rapids, MI would have been about eight hours. However, after seeking reliable spiritual direction I was advised to write a letter to accept your request to meet. In the process of writing this letter, I began to thoroughly research the situation, from the combined insight obtained from three professionals perspectives, as a priest, as a psychologist, and as a historian. Through these perspectives, I have analyzed the many ways in which I was a victim of antigay hierarchal violence, having no judicial oversight to appeal to for protection within the church or civilly. This is an unidentified form of structural violence directed not at me alone but also many priests, theologians, sisters, religious and others, including Pope Francis for the past four decades - all have been victims of this form of violence. 

S t r u c t u r a l   V i o l e n c e
by Deborah Du Nann Winter and Dana C. Leighton
Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century
Direct violence is horrific, but its brutality usually gets our attention: we notice it, and often respond to it. Structural violence, however, is almost always invisibleembedded in ubiquitous social structures, normalized by stable institutions and regular experience. Structural violence occurs whenever people are disadvantaged by political, legal, economic, or cultural traditions. Because they are longstanding, structural inequities usually seem ordinary—the way things are and always have been. But structural violence produces suffering and death as often as direct violence does, though the damage is slower, more subtle, more common, and more difficult to repair. The chapters in this section teach us about some important but invisible forms of structural violence, and alert us to the powerful cultural mechanisms that create and maintain them over generations…
One outcome of exclusionary thinking is the belief that victims of violence must in some way deserve their plight. But certainly it is easy to see that young children do not deserve to be victims…
Section II:  Winter, D. D., & Leighton, D. C. (2001). Structural violenceIn D. J. Christie, R. V. Wagner, & D. D. Winter (Eds.), Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st centuryNew York: Prentice-Hall.

The main purpose of this form of structural violence is to silence and remove anyone in the Church who openly discusses the science on the sexual orientation of homosexuality - gay people. This antigay hierarchical, structural violence has been successful in firmly suppressing this science on homosexuality for the past 60 years. In 1957, world renowned psychologist, Dr. Evelyn Hooker conducted ground breaking research proving that homosexuality is not a mental illness. She proved that being homosexual was just as normal as being heterosexual. For years the hierarchical church has rebuked such scientifically sound findings and have championed the obsessive suppression of gay people. Such actions lead to question who benefits from falsifying truth? The hierarchical church did not suppress the scientific research on heart surgery or cancer for the past 60 years. This vicious form of gay suppression is entrenched in the corruption of the curia in which speaking the truth has become a reprehensible thing. Through my years of analysis, I have come to find that the greatest harm this suppression imposes is on our children.

Truly I tell you, unless you 
change and become like little children, 
you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. 
Therefore, whoever takes the lowly position of this 
child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. 
And whoever welcomes one such child in 
my name welcomes me. 
Matthew 18: 3-5

…whoever causes one of these 
little ones 
who believe in Me to stumble, 
it would be better for him 
to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, 
and to be drowned in the 
depth of the sea. 
Matthew 18:6

My “coming out” in March 1997 was all based on substantiated science and scripture. Furthermore, it was motivated to protect defenseless children. How did risking my life by coming out warrant such extreme vindictive retaliation for the past 20 years by members of the curia and hierarchy? 

How did it get twisted around that I refused to return to the Grand Rapids Dioceses, when in fact, it was made clear to me that it was unsafe for me to return by their coercing me to acquiesce to being sent away to be re-educated on the science on the sexual orientation of homosexuality. They wanted me to leave the priesthood on my own, which would be another grave sin to commit. Since I had no recourse to appeal to for justice in 1997 - what recourse would I have available to me if I returned and more severe immoral tactics were used against me?

This tactic of the curia to dispose of someone was most recently demonstrated by Cardinal Raymond Burke firing Boeselager the Grand Chancellor of the Knights of Malta. Burke falsified a papal decision of Pope Francis that no one was to be fired, that the problematic issues with the Knights of Malta should be resolved through dialogue. Burke without any true dialogue with Boeselager stated that it was Pope Francis’s wish that he resign as the Grand Chancellor of the Knights of Malta. When Boeselager refused to resign because of “unreasonable circumstances,” Burke fired him on the grounds of disobedience. Sound familiar?  Boeselager, then appealed directly to Pope Francis and an investigation was ordered into the firing of Boeselager. It was later exposed that the grounds that Burke had used against Boeselager were over “condoms.” However, this information was contrived by a group of Burke’s supporters known as “Lepanto Institute for the Restoration of All Things in Christ.” This group is described as a “militant traditionalist organization close to Burke (Austen Ivereigh).” “This ultraconservative organization specialized in the denunciation of "gays” entering the Church and in attacks on the major development associations that question unfettered economic liberalism (La Croix International).” On February 4, 2017, Pope Francis replaced Cardinal Burke as the Patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta and overnight all over Rome appeared posters of Pope Francis with a sad expression with the words - “Where is your mercy?”

It was the truth from science and religion that morally obligated me to come out for the protection of children growing up gay in March 1997. This was an act of love and my duty as a priest. It is the true meaning of being a priest. Pope Francis  on Thursday, June 22, 2017  in his homily during Mass at Casa Santa Marta confirmed this fact stating,"The Good Shepherd gives his life for his sheep,” using as an example the parish priest of Barbiana, Fr. Don Milani, the from the Diocese of Firenze (Florence). 

The research to find the answers to these questions endlessly kept unfolding more and more information that led back in time - more than a century and a half. The research doors were opened wide once Pope Francis was elected and he along with his team of experts, and cardinals began reforming the curia. The research revealed two main historical events that were dependent on exploiting societal prejudices against gay people to rise and to stay in power. The, first, began with the ideology of Nazism promoted by Hitler and the Nazi regime that led to the deaths of 70 million people unprecedented in human history. The, second, began the with ideology of the “trickle-down theory” known as Reaganomics that led to Globalization and the greatest inequality in human history - “A world where 1% of humanity controls as much wealth as the bottom 99% will never be stable (President Obama’s departing speech to the UN General Assembly September 2016). Ian Kershaw explains what Hitler’s place in history will be:

…Primarily, as the inspiration of the most lethal and destructive war in history, and of the most terrible genocidethe world has ever seen. He left behind him not just physical, but also moral, ruination such as history has never previously experienced. He represented an extreme pathology of modern society. He showed us the most radical face of modern inhumanity – how an advanced society can undergo a breathtaking descent into modern barbarity that’s quite without precedent. That’s what, with the passage of time, we can see was historically defining about Hitler. Never before Hitler’s time had we seen so clearly what human beings are capable of…
…we shouldn’t mystify Hitler’s personality. The uniquenessof Nazism can’t be reduced to that strange personality. Another time, another place, and Hitler would have had no impact at all. He couldn’t have derailed a modern society without that society itself making a major contribution to its own fate… We shouldn’t be complacent about the future. New forms of fascism and racial intolerance rightly appal and worry us…
…what we can do is to remind ourselves of the essential point about Hitler: he represented the most fundamental and frontal assault ever launched on all that we associate with humanity and civilisation. 
Excerpt from: - Hitler’s Place in History - Ian Kershaw
Professor of Modern History at Sheffield University
Lecture - Wednesday 27th April 2005

Over the past year and a half - I have been researching and writing 24/7, since I received your letter - gathering significant amounts of factual data on all three levels (as a priest, psychologist and historian). This research includes my personal experience of being a victim of the hierarchical, antigay violence. As it happens when I do research, such as it did when I was doing the qualitative research on the Holocaust in graduate school for psychology, it is only after thoroughly exhausting every possible avenue several times do all the pieces begin to fall into place like  a jigsaw puzzle that a picture is formed. 

The picture centers on the crucial importance for the safety and well-being of all of humanity present and on into the future and is dependent on maintaining an ongoing dialogue between science and religion. This is necessary to obtain truth that which then gives meaning and value to love. Without this truth formed through this process - 

…Love becomes an empty shell, to be filled in an arbitrary way. In a culture without truth, this is the fatal risk facing love. It falls prey to contingent subjective emotions and opinions, the word “love” is abused and distorted,to the point where it comes to mean the opposite… 
Benedict XVI - Caritas in Veritate 2007  2009

Pope Benedict XVI goes on to make the warning that “Any breachin this dialogue comes only at an enormous price to human development…” St. Pope John Paul II made an early statement to this effect explaining how science and religion cannot be separated. He explains - as Benedict does that science is the study of all of God’s creation and religion is formed from the bible, which is the inspired word of God. They both explain how the dialogue between science and religion becomes a self-correcting mechanism of oversight, preventing abuse and maintaining integrity of both science and religion - thus allowing science and religion to guide us on our journey into the future. Both John Paul II and Benedict XVI are writing from their experience having lived through the atrocities of Hitler and the Nazi regime (1933-1945) that resulted from their manipulation and abuse of science and religion to invent a pseudo-science to legitimize Hitler’s ideology of Nazism and pseudo-religious terms to promote it. They experienced living in a social environment saturated in the racial ideology of Nazism - where the meaning of love was so twisted around that in actuality love meant the opposite. Love meant exterminating people considered to be less than human or subhuman - “Life Unworthy Of Life.” 

With the recent election of President Trump we are experiencing living in a similar social environment saturated with the ideology of the “trickle-down theory.” This led to Globalization that was also legitimized by the manipulation of science and religion that twisted the meaning of love around to mean the exact opposite. In addition to Mr. Trump’s behavior, the Republican Convention 2016 slogans, “Lock her up!” (that sounded like the palpable hysteria of the Nazi Party “Sieg Heil” chant at a Cathedral lit Nuremberg Rally of the 1930s) and his being elected US president are all blatant examples of love twisted to mean the opposite. Both the rise of Nazism and Globalization were depended on the exploitation of societal prejudices against gay people. 

However, in regards to rise of the  “trickle-down theory”of the 1980s that led to Globalization - the majority of the members of the curia and hierarchy are responsible for the exploitation of societal prejudices against gay people. The research of Dr. Evelyn Hooker and subsequent research completely dispel prejudices against gay people. Instead of the curia and hierarchy acknowledging the truth of this science - they manipulated religion by misusing the bible and continued to wrongly condemn homosexuality. Thus they twisted the meaning of truth around to the point that it continues to mean the opposite. They and their supporters are not about truth and therefore not about love. They are no different than the palpable hysteria of the Nazi Party “Sieg Heil” members at the Nuremberg Rallies of the 1930s. And this is the violence, their twisted meaning of truth - the complete absence of love, they have used against me and against so many others before and after me. Some of our best and brightest theologians and bridge makers, such as, Sister Jeannine Gramick and Fr. Robert Nugent. Gramick and Nugent have been responsible since 1977 for saving millions of people’s lives, especially very young children. To the best of my knowledge, they were the first to begin an ongoing dialogue on the science of the sexual orientation of homosexuality - gay people and religion - scripture and theology.   

S c i e n c e   can purify religion from error and superstition; 
R e l i g i o n   can purify science from idolatry and false absolutes. 
Each can draw the other into a wider world, 
a world in which both can flourish. 
For the truth of the matter is that the Church and the scientific 
community will inevitably interact; their options 
do not include isolation. 
St. Pope John Paul II - 1988

I came out in March 1997: for the protection of children, as young as 4 and 5 years of age, who are growing up gay. Since then it has become a moral obligation to educate and prevent forced parental suppression and unsubstantiated antigay social and religious norms.What has bothered me ever since was the fact that I found it difficult to find the  r o o t   c a u s e  in understanding “how” and “why” and “when” did the meaning of “love” and “truth” get so monumentally - twisted around; notably among the majority of the members of the curia and hierarchy to mean the exact opposite.

For the past 10 years I have been writing in an effort to explain how this mindless inquisition that started almost immediately after coming out in June 1997 - of being coerced “behind closed doors” by a directive from the curia conveyed by the bishop for me to acquiesce to being sent away “somewhere” to be re-educated on the science on the sexual orientation of homosexuality. This directive was not only shocking, but traumatizing as well. 

This irrational directive from the curia completely negated the immediate need of protecting the lives of millions of very young defenseless children from lifelong debilitating harmful effects. It also negated the wealth of the authoritative substantiated research gathered from the major medical and mental health associations, institutions, and organizations, including universities. This was the reason for my “coming out.” 

Through knowledge acquired during my studies at the University of Michigan and attending the American Psychological Association National Conventions my research was reinforced on the science of sexual orientation. The action of the curia and hierarchy was a blatant affront, a direct attack on truth and love, as taught and embodied in Jesus Christ, of which the entire purpose and meaning of priesthood is based on. It was like a supervisor telling a heart surgeon that he is going to be be sent away on a sabbatical to be reeducated on the ancient system of medicine known as “bloodletting.” I cannot explain how twisted it sounded - to be told such absurdity!!! “Who in the hell is running this ship?!?” I was 47 years old at the time.

How did the curia and hierarchy cause a breach in the dialogue between science and religion that ended up twisting the meaning of love around to mean the opposite?

We will learn from studying the - science on sexual orientation that it is composed of interrelated biological and psychological processes that are not able to be consciously controlled or suppressed. These interrelated processes function outside our conscious awareness - automatically and continuously throughout life as part of the autonomic nervous system - like the heart beating and breathing. The continuous functioning of our sexual orientation - is essential in meeting our most basic human need for love, attachment, intimacy, through which empathy is developed. The continuous functioning of our sexual orientation is as vital to human survival from the beginning of life to the end - as the heart beating and breathing. Any attempt to force the suppression of a child’s gay sexual orientation is the same as suppressing the heart and breathing rate which can cause a number of lifelong adverse effects (persistent form of depression (dysthymia), suicidal ideation, and obsessive dislike for gay people that is implicit, to explicit verbal expressions of hate, to lethal forms of violence, and torture).

The majority of the members of the curia and hierarchy are European. They are the ones who grew up in the toxic antigay social environments left behind by Hitler’s Nazi regime. This begins to explain the long history of the majority of the members of the curia and hierarchy’s collective obsessive antigay crusade. This collective thought suppressed all emerging science on homosexuality for the past 60 years. For these members of the curia and hierarchy the thought of gay science has been a long closed door slammed shut in their early childhood years. This was out of great fear from their witnessing the terror in the adult’s warnings of how Hitler treated priests who were found out to be homosexuals. As this trauma of the early childhood events are not remembered, only the emotional terror of the event remains. It is this emotional terror that is wronglymistaken as an innate guiding voice of their conscience strongly conveying to them that homosexuality is evil. This misunderstanding then becomes a force that completely obliterates years of scientific research on homosexuality. It is more likely that such scientific research ignites seemingly unending waves of unexplainable terror. That door slammed tightly shut - is the breach in the dialogue between science and religion on the issue of homosexuality. This is a childhood defense mechanism. It is the only means available to the child to stop the unending waves of fear. However, as adults, these childhood defenses must be reexamined in a safe environment - to be challenged in the adult dialogue between science and religion on issues of homosexuality. As Pope Benedict XVI explains, this is the only process to find truth and give real value and meaning to the understanding of love. I do not presume this to be an easy task to unravel and should only be attempted in a safe environment. However, this situation - is not unusual - it brings to mind the words of St. Paul to be understood with great care and empathy.  

When I was a child, I talked like a child, 
I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. 
When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me.
1 Corinthians 13:11

No, no, no this type of breach in the dialogue between science and religion on gay sexual orientation has to stop! Justice demands that I be exonerated and proper restitution be made for all harm endured, including the lost salary for the past 20 years to be made quickly. Not to follow through on this road of true justice is to continue this breach in the dialogue between science and religion on gay sexual orientation. Am I, like so many others, going to be made an example of what happens when a priest speaks aloud the truth? Will this be a situation reminiscent of Hitler’s regime to remove and silence Anti-Nazi priests? Are you going demonstrate publicly how an advanced society of people made a major contribution to the modern barbarity of Hitler and the Nazi regime by their complicity and indifference?

 My moral obligation as a priest is to protect people, especially children.

I look forward to setting a time to dialogue the reality of this situation in the light of the warnings of both St. Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI while maintaining an open discussion between science and religion for the search of truth that leads to love. 

Sincerely yours, 

Fr. Marty Kurylowicz 

Cc. Pope Francis
PS. For more information on the: 
  • Science of Homosexual Sexual Orientation 
  • Gay Adult Porn & Homophobia - Who views it the most and why?
  • Vatican’s Swiss Guards Break Up a D r u g - F u e l e d   G a y   O r g y 
at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith - July 2017
  • “Priests In Panties” 2010 
  • Who is the blame for all the gay closeted sexual acting-out scandals at the Vatican?
Can be found online at the -Thalamus Center 
  • Saturday, July 1, 2017 - Pope Francis - Teaches the World to Dance the TANGO - the Dance of LOVE - INCLUSION - through - DIALOGUE! -


Letter from Bishop Walkowiak
Bishop of Grand Rapids Diocese - Dated, September 17, 2015 

Letter from Archbishop Joël Mercier
Secretary of the Congregation for the Clergy - 3 March 2015


The end of the letter.

 nudity symbolized
But during the Renaissance 
that changed, 
for the first time a
naked body was "dirty."

The Eyes Have It: Sex and Sexual Orientation 
Differences in Pupil Dilation Patterns 
August 3, 2012 PhotoPhoto

USCCB Corrosive effects of PORNOGRAPHY??? 2015, Synod of Bishops 2015, & 
Last Judgment, Sistine Chapel

Is Some Homophobia 
University of Rochester, April 2012

Science +

+ Religion = Truth = LOVE




Re-education Clinics - of homosexual sexual orientation 

QUACKS: 'Conversion Therapists,' the Anti-LGBT Right, and the Demonization of Homosexuality May 25, 2016
This is a report about junk science and some of the people who propagate it. It is not about silly, perhaps amusing theories about ESP or life on the moon or even purported miracle cures for cancer. The “science” examined here actively harms people, leading with grim regularity to suicidedepression and an array of self-destructive behaviors. It demeans, defames and defrauds human beings, typically at their most vulnerable moments. And, as if that weren’t enough, it regularly lays the blame for the alleged malady of homosexuality at the feet of gay people’s parents, despite the fact that they are wholly innocent.
Executive Summary
...The real science is perfectly clear. A consensus of the vast majority of psychiatrists, psychologists and other counselors and their professional organizations agree that homosexuality is a normal variation of human sexuality. Likewise, they condemn reparative therapy and other attempts to change sexual orientation

Gay in Latin America: Legal but deadly - CNN -
The perplexing narrative about being gay in Latin America
March 3, 2017
...Violence despite progressive LGBT protection laws Read more:

June 26, 2017
The following is a list of activities and events of anti-LGBT organizations and individuals. Organizations listed as anti-LGBT hate groups are designated with an asterisk. Read more: 

THE BREACH - Antigay Prejudices, Unsubstantiated, Suppression, Repression, Exploitation, Globalization, Annihilation - - NO SCIENCE - - NO TRUTH - - THEREFORE - - - NO LOVE


Early Childhood Memories
Severe Antigay Violence 
The Pope: Journey from liberal to conservative
12 February 2013
…In 1966, just after the end of the Council, Joseph Ratzinger took up a new academic position at Tubingen University, which was at the time the flagship of liberal theology in Germany. So when student revolutions convulsed Western Europe and the United States two years later, he was a first-hand witness.
The experience changed his life. Years afterwards he recalled the "traumatic memory" of a group of theology students at Tubingen who put out a flier claiming that "the New Testament is a document of inhumanity, a large scale deception of the masses", and asking "so what is Jesus's Cross but the expression of a sado-masochistic glorification of pain?
Prof Ratzinger, as a German who had grown up in the 1930s, understood all too well what a totalitarian regime could do. He saw a new left-wing totalitarianism at work in the revolutionary spirit of the 1960s.
"It is true I saw a new spirit creeping in," he said. "A spirit in which fanatical ideologies made use of the spirit of Christianity… Here I saw very clearly… that there was an abuse of the Church and the faith, which were used as instruments of power.”…

E.J. Dionne: Pope Benedict’s legacy is one of paradox 
Feb.11, 2013
…The student revolts of 1968 deeply alarmed him. “At the time,” he wrote, “I was dean of the faculty of theology at [the University of] Tubingen, and in all the university assemblies in which I participated, I could notice all kinds of terror, from subtle psycho-terror up to violence.”
He described how he initially regarded Marxism as a possible corrective to certain strains of modern thought. But he came in the late 1960s to identify it with “terror.” He added: “I think that in those years, I learned where discussion must stop because it is turning into a lie and resistance must begin in order to maintain freedom.”…
The paradoxes of Benedict — and perhaps of Catholicism itself — were visible in two statements he made at ChristmastimeProgressives could only welcome an op-ed piece he wrote for the Financial Times on Dec. 19 in which he declared that “Christians fight poverty out of a recognition of the supreme dignity of every human being, created in God’s image and destined for eternal life.”
Yet he followed this with a Christmas sermon denouncing gay marriage, insisting that gays and lesbians were turning their backs on the “essence of the human creature” and denying “their nature.”
Read more:
- vs -

Powerful, & Enduring     
Memory of 
Grand Haven,  Lighthouse,  Lake Michigan
Powerful, Enduring & 
Memory of 
Fr. Marty Kurylowicz


Fr. Marty Kurylowicz - June 9, 2017 - Excerpts:

Holy Family Parish, 
Sparta, Michigan 
The hierarchy and Pope Francis -  vividly validated the reasoning for the immediacy - why I came out in March 1997, as pastor of Holy Family Parish, Sparta, Michigan - for the protection of gay children, as young as 4 and 5 years of age - from the lifelong harmful effects growing up gay or bisexual - during early childhood caused by the influence of anti-gay social and religious norms. These lifelong harmful effects can be clearly observed in the curia and hierarchy fierce homophobic behavior - their inability to form life-long meaningful and fulfilling relationships, including their inability to connect with others, their lack of empathy for others, their over concerns about outward appearance, status and careers, as noted in Pope Francis "Christmas address to the curia", December 22, 2014.  It is not only their complete absence of maintaining any ongoing dialogue between science and religion on the topic homosexual sexual orientation for the past 60 years, which is directly against the words of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI , it is also by their immediate emotional explosive outbursts to the 2014 midterm report of Synod session on Family - that listed notes of the open discussion that took place -  discussing ways of how to be pastorally more welcoming to gay people and their families, including ways of valuing long term committed gay relationships. There was a lot of emotional outbursts among the curia and hierarchyhowever, there is absolutely - no detail reasoning to substantiate their extraordinary hostile and aggressive reactions to the report. So intense was their fierce emotional reaction that the continuation of this open discussion on gay people scheduled for the second synod on Family session 2015 had to be canceled.

Sadly, one cannot, also, help to notice the enormous amount of the emotional psychic energy that is use by the curia and the hierarchy completely absorbed in an anti-gay obsession and the enormous amount of Pope Francis emotional psychic energy is used in reaching out to all people globally in nearly every situation in extraordinary effort to be inclusive of everyone, particularly those most forgotten and are in need of our help. Pope Francis has been relentless in this regard since his election to the papacy in March 2013.

As Church Shifts, a Cardinal Welcomes Gays; They Embrace a ‘Miracle’ The New York Times - June 13, 2017
NEWARK — The word “pilgrimage” usually evokes visions of far-off, exotic places, but for some 100 gay and lesbian Catholics and their families, a pilgrimage to the Cathedral Basilica of the Sacred Heart here on a recent Sunday was more like a homecoming.
The doors to the cathedral were opened to them, and they were welcomed personally by the leader of the Archdiocese of Newark, Cardinal Joseph W. Tobin. They were seated on folding chairs at the cathedral’s center, in front of the altar in the towering sanctuary, under the blue-tinted glow of stained glass.
“I am Joseph, your brother,” Cardinal Tobin told the group, which included lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Catholics from around New York and the five dioceses in New Jersey. “I am your brother, as a disciple of Jesus. I am your brother, as a sinner who finds mercy with the Lord.”
The welcoming of a group of openly gay people to Mass by a leader of Cardinal Tobin’s standing in the Roman Catholic Church in this country would have been unthinkable even five years ago. But Cardinal Tobin, whom Pope Francis appointed to Newark last year, is among a small but growing group of bishops changing how the American church relates to its gay members. They are seeking to be more inclusive and signaling to subordinate priests that they should do the same…
Four years ago, Pope Francis shook the Catholic world with his comment about gay priests seeking the Lord: “Who am I to judge?” But it was unclear how his words would affect Catholics seeking acceptance in the pews…
But gestures like Cardinal Tobin’s are evidence that Pope Francis’ words are having an impact…Read more:
Fr. Marty Kurylowicz - June 9, 2017
S c i e n c e    
H o m o s e x u a l 
S e x u a l  O r i e n t a t i o n   


In the USA, 1957Evelyn Hooker’s most notable and ground breaking research proving that homosexuality is not a mental illness was completed called:-
 in which she administered several psychological tests to groups of self-identified male homosexuals and heterosexuals and asked experts to identify the homosexuals and rate their mental health. The experiment, which other researchers subsequently repeated, argues that homosexuality is not a mental disorder, as there was no detectable difference between homosexual and heterosexual men in terms of mental adjustment... Photo

Being Gay Is Just as Healthy as Being Straight
Evelyn Hooker's pioneering research debunked the popular myth that homosexuals are inherently less mentally healthy than heterosexuals, leading to significant changes in how psychology views and treats people who are gay...
Hooker's work was the first to empirically test the assumption that gay men were mentally unhealthy and maladjusted. The fact that no differences were found between gay and straight participants sparked more research in this area and began to dismantle the myth that homosexual men and women are inherently unhealthy.
In conjunction with other empirical results, this work led the American Psychiatric Association to remove homosexuality from the DSM in 1973 (it had been listed as a sociopathic personality disorder). In 1975, the American Psychological Association publicly supported this move, stating that "homosexuality per se implies no impairment in judgment, reliability or general social and vocational capabilities…(and mental health professionals should) take the lead in removing the stigma of mental illness long associated with homosexual orientation." Although prejudice and stigma still exist in society, this research has helped millions of gay men and women gain acceptance in the mental health community. Read more:                               

A B S E N C E   o f   S C I E N C E

B l i n d   o p t i m i s m
by Ian Kershaw 

Ian Kershaw “is regarded by many as one of the world's leading experts on Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany (” Kershaw describes in great detail - the horrific atrocities instigated by Hitler and how we should see his place in history. Kershaw looks upon Hitler’s place in history as: 

Primarily, as the inspiration of the most lethal and destructive war in history, and of the most terrible genocide the world has ever seen. He left behind him not just physical, but also moralruination such as history has never previously experienced. He represented an extreme pathology of modern society. He showed us the most radical face of modern inhumanity – how an advanced society can undergo a breathtaking descent into modern barbarity that’s quite without precedent…
Read more:
Hitler's Place in History
Ian Kershaw
Professor of Modern History at Sheffield University
Wednesday 27th April 2005

…The horror of the Holocaust began in 1933 and ended in 1945. The psychological fallout would have been far more extensive and more deadly, especially when it is not identified as such…
AUSCHWITZ -- CHRISTMAS 2008 -- A flashback far more severe than in --- BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN – December 26, 2008 – Fr. Marty Kurylowicz

 Know thyself 
Oracle at Delphi 

This above all: 
to thine own self be true,
 And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man
William Shakespeare

Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your 
brother's eye and pay no attention to the 
plank in your own eye? How can you 
say to your brother, 'Brother, 
let me take the speck 
out of your eye,
'when you yourself fail to see the 
plank in your own eye? You hypocrite,
 first take the plank out of your eye, and 
then you will see clearly to remove 
the speck from your brother's eye. 
Luke 6:40-42
D i s s o c i a t i o n    
S e l e c t i v e   
I n a t t e n t i o n 
From  L O V E
Killing Empathy 
Creating Narcissists 
i.e. Curia & Hierarchy
The Closet: Psychological Issues of Being In and Coming Out
October 01, 2004 | Cultural Psychiatry, Dissociative Identity Disorder
By Jack Drescher, MD
In the jargon of contemporary homosexual culture, those who hide their sexual identities are referred to as either closeted or said to be in the closet. Revealing one's homosexuality is referred to as coming out. Clinical experience with gay patients reveals hiding and revealing behaviors to be psychologically complex.

Homosexual Identities
In the developmental histories of gay men and women, periods of difficulty in acknowledging their homosexuality, either to themselves or to others, are often reported. Children who grow up to be gay rarely receive family support in dealing with antihomosexual prejudices. On the contrary, beginning in childhood--and distinguishing them from racial and ethnic minorities--gay people are often subjected to the antihomosexual attitudes of their own families and communities (Drescher et al., 2004). Antihomosexual attitudes include homophobia (Weinberg, 1972), heterosexism (Herek, 1984), moral condemnations of homosexuality (Drescher, 1998) and antigay violence (Herek and Berrill, 1992). Hiding activities learned in childhood often persist into young adulthoodmiddle age and even senescence, leading many gay people to conceal important aspects of themselves… 

What psychological mechanisms facilitate separating one's sexual identity from the rest of one's persona? Sullivan's (1956) concept of dissociation may be illuminating, particularly its most common aspect: selective inattention. A ubiquitous, nonpathological process, selective inattention makes life more manageable, like tuning out the background noise on a busy street. However, through dissociation of anxiety-provoking knowledge about the self, a whole double life can be lived and yet, in some ways, not be known. Clinical presentations of closeted gay people may lie somewhere in severity between selective inattention--most commonly seen in the case of homosexually self-aware patients thinking about "the possibility" that they might be gay--to more severe dissociation--in which any hint of same-sex feelings resides totally out of conscious awareness. More severe forms of dissociation are commonly observed in married men who are homosexually self-aware but cannot permit the thought of themselves as gay (Roughton, 2002). Read more:

17 Antigay Leaders Exposed as Gay or Bi 
- January 27, 2016 
  The internet was buzzing in January when an editor at a gay website in Virginia wrote that he'd encountered an antigay Republican lawmaker while on Grindr, without naming the person. Not every antigay crackpot is actually gay, but there's no shortage of those who actually are. Here are some hypocrites who just couldn't practice what they preached…

child’s sexual orientation is not about sexual behavior - it is about love, wanting to feel one with another. Depending on the severity of this rejection of a child’s expression of love - the child wants to desperately please his parents and will learn to hid from his parent such emotions of love that are disturbing to them. He will even hide them from himself and thus begins the mental dissociation of this child - attempting to suppress the never ending - regular functioning of his sexual orientation of the emotional impulses - to be loved and to love and to feel one with another

Sexual orientation refers to an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic and/or sexual attractions to men, women or both sexes...

 Autonomic nervous system The autonomic nervous system is a control system that acts largely unconsciously and regulates bodily functions such as the heart rate, digestion, respiratory rate, pupillary response, urination, and sexual arousal 

However, as explained above - a person’s sexual orientation like the heart beating, breathing, sexual arousal, etc., are all under the control autonomic nervous system that operates automatically and unconsciously - they cannot be suppressed. 

The Eyes Have It: Sex and Sexual Orientation Differences in Pupil Dilation Patterns
August 3. 2012   pupil dilation to stimuli indicates activation of the autonomic nervous system. This system is associated with many automatic processes such as perspiration, digestion, blood pressure, and heart rate. For this reason, pupil dilation has been used as indicator of automatic response, for example, in studies of implicit reaction and cognitive load. Other research suggests that pupil dilation can reflect automatic attention, or attention that is likely not in the conscious control of participants. It is therefore unlikely that participants suppress pupil dilation to stimuli they are sexually attracted to. Pupil dilation patterns could therefore reflect, with high sensitivity, automatic attention related to sexual attraction and sexual orientation

Brokeback Mountain” 2005

AUSCHWITZ -- CHRISTMAS 2008 -- A flashback far more severe than in --- BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN 
December 26, 2008 – Fr. Marty Kurylowicz

I have been so saddened by Pope Benedict XVI's cruel words to LGBTQ people around the world, to their parents, families and friends, most ESPECIALLY TO CHILDREN. After reading the accounts of this human travesty, I did not know where to find comfort or hope. And then I thought about your blog. And just like receiving a wonderful Christmas present, sure enough I found the hope and comfort I needed to hear. Photo 

I am a priest and a clinical psychologist (MS). And for one of my research projects I chose to do a qualitative research project of the recorded verbal accounts of survivors of the Holocaust, 50 years after the event. It was a difficult research project, because I could not make sense of one of the accounts of the survivors. 

For example, one survivor was describing what it was like riding the train to AUSCHWITZ, but he was describing how he was trying to make conversation with a girl on the train. I listened and wrote out this one account almost 30 times but I just was not getting it. I could not understand how this man could be talking about wanting to make conversation with this girl on the same train to AUSCHWITZ!?! 

Because I had taught high school religion classes for nearly 20 years, it hit me hard, like a flash of lightning. Instantly, all the pieces came together, so fast. Though this survivor was in his late 60’s when he gave his account of his story on audiotape, he was remembering the events that took place, but naturally they were recounted through the mind of a teenager, the age he was on the train to AUSCHWITZ. That is why the dialogue wasn’t making any sense. I was thinking of him as an old man because the voice on the audiotape was the voice of a 68-year-old. As shocking as a bomb going off, all the different aspects of the psychological developmental stages of a teenager kicked in. I realized only too fully that he was just a young normal teenager on that train!!! And so was the girl he was trying to make conversation, and their moms and dads were there with them!!! There was no way to pretend I did not realize what I discovered. It kept hitting me: this is not some script from a movie or TV miniseries on the Holocaust. No; as much as I wished it were. The reality of this horror hit me all at once, on so many different levels of consciousness: what an unbelievable horror it was!!! How could we treat human beings like this! I remember when the realization of the magnitude of this horror first hit me, like an instant reflex. I threw down the transcript I was holding as if it were a blazing hot poker. It kept hitting me over and over again that this is not a movie script or some kind of play – this really happened! It really happened! Oh, my God, how could this have happened!?!!!

My supervisor told me at the time that I was traumatized by the oral content. Qualitative research is an attempt to understand the complexity of emotions, the kinds of emotions, and the degree of intensity involved. Our emotions are what allow us to connect with other human beings. We identify with the non-verbal quality of emotions more immediately and strongly than with the words used to express them. The non-verbal qualities include tone of voice, eye contact, facial expression, body posture, and gestures, all of which express emotions. Emotions are why we can connect with people through time, across cultures, and individually. It is the expression of human emotions in the arts that makes some works of art timeless, because they continually speak to all people through the ages. 

And when I heard what Pope Benedict XVI said about homosexuals and transgendered human beings at Christmas 2008, I felt that same trauma all over again. Because in some way, somehow, he was conveying in a non-verbal manner the horror of the Holocaust, in what appears to be a traumatized, trance-like, accepted social norm from that period of time dictating that some people just don’t count, aren’t important, and can be easily disposed of. And if you rock the boat, you could be next to be disposed of.

I truly have to believe that a person in his position would not be doing this consciously or intentionally. The horror of the Holocaust is like an atomic bomb with fallout so extensive that it spreads over a radius of more than 150 miles. The horror of the Holocaust began in 1933 and ended in 1945. The psychological fallout would have been far more extensive and more deadly, especially when it is not identified as such.

It hit me the way it did when I realized that the research I was doing about a Holocaust survivor, a man 68 years old telling his story, who was remembering what it was like to be on the train to AUSCHWITZ, from the perspective of a young teenage boy who just wanted to talk to a girl. It seemed like the same kind of horror, a tacit assumption that some people don't count and can be disposed of without remorse. Could it be that Benedict XVI is unconsciously repeating Hitler's crime against humanity by taking on a long-accepted social attitude from that period of time? 

The question I asked myself was: what would it have been like for someone growing up gay during the Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals 1933 -1945

What would be the severity of the psychological effects on a boy who grew up to be gay in Germany during the time of Hitler’s NAZI PERSECUTION OF HOMOSEXUALS 1933 -1945? During the Nazi regime, homosexuals were publicly defamed and falsely accused for the major social problems of that time, which was done to incite massive public hatred and hostility directed against homosexuals. Homosexuals were used for medical experiments, physically mutilated, brutally tortured and exterminated.

Would this child, as an adult, in a severe dissociated state of mind from his own homosexual feelings (Harry Stack Sullivan MD, Dissociative Processes, Clinical Studies on Psychiatry (1956)), unconsciously perpetuate the terrifying horror of the insensitivity he had experienced growing up? If he found himself in a position of authority would he recreate the same social and political environment of violence and terror for homosexuals that he experienced, as a child who grew up to be gay, during the NAZI PERSECUTION OF HOMOSEXUALS? 

I think in truth on a much deeper level I was frightened, really frightened, to hear Pope Benedict XVI’s Christmas remarks against homosexuals and transgendered human beings and even more frightened by the silence from the larger global community of human beings. What is so frightening is, even if there is agreement that one person does not matter or is not important, in truth then no one matters. Therefore, when I thought about your blog and what you did on October 5, 2008, I felt more reassured, I felt hope, and I felt comforted. NOW, isn’t that the true meaning of Christmas? 

God Bless you,

Fr. Marty Kurylowicz

. . . .Written by Martin S. Kurylowicz, M.Div., M.S.
Edited by Madeline Wright, Ph.D., M.S. . . . .


Kids Are Being Hurt!!!
What you cannot do is 
accept injustice.
From Hitler – or anyone.
You must make the injustice visible
– be prepared to die like a
 soldier to do so.
Mahatma Gandhi

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me.

Pope Francis offers 'radicals' Dorothy Day and Thomas Merton as models Sep.24.2015
Rachel Maddow describes the lives of Dorothy Day and Thomas Merton, two American Catholics singled out by Pope Francis in his address to Congress, and talks with Father Matt Malone, Jesuit priest and editor-in-chief of American Magazine, about why the pope...Watch video:

P o p e   F r a n c i s
New York City - 2015 - Arrival 
High School Band Plays - Theme Song
Pope's hope for Congress contrasts with American cynicism
Senator Amy Klobuchar talks with Rachel Maddow about Pope Francis delivering a message beyond the confines of religion and speaking to the nobility of public service in politics in working toward the common good for all people.

Pope Francis arrives in New York City for historic visit 
September 25, 2015
As entrances go, this one was divine.
Pope Francis touched down in New York City on Thursday to the strains of “New York, New York” and began his historic 39-hour pilgrimage to the city that never sleeps by taking a drive up Fifth Ave…

'I Am Convinced That We Can Make A Difference,' Pope Tells Congress, 

Pope Francis is greeted as he arrives at a lunch for homeless people who are regularly fed by Catholic Charities, at St. Patrick's Church in Washington DC. 
September 24, 2015 Photo

Pope Francis spends lunch hour with homeless
Washington DC September 24, 2015
Pope Francis spent his lunch hour with some of Washington's homeless at a meals program run by Catholic charities. CNN's Carol Costello reports.
Watch video:
Pope Francis Dines with DC Homeless for Lunch
September 24, 2015
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- He's been called the pope of the poor. And on Thursday he spoke directly to those who have gone without.
"In prayer there is no first or second class," Pope Francis said. "There is brotherhood."
He shared his message of hope with people who work directly with the poor and some of the needy they serve, like Lanita King, a former drug addict who once was homeless.
"It felt like energy went right through my hand. He touched it and grabbed it," King recalled.
King was one of many who connected with the pope and felt blessed.
"He is delivering the message that God is here for us. God is here with us," she said.
…And if there were any question about the pope's priorities, he passed up a lunch in his honor on Capitol Hill to come here and spend time with the less fortunate.
Read more - watch video:

Pope Francis: "No justification whatsoever" for lack of housing
September 24, 2015
WASHINGTON -- Outside St. Patrick's Church in downtown Washington, denizens of Catholic Charities' various housing shelters waited for Pope Francis' visit.
The pontiff spoke about the plight of the homeless in remarks when he arrived at the church."We can find no social or moral justification, no justification whatsoever, for lack of housing," he said. "The Son of God came into this world as a homeless person. The Son of God knew what it was to start life without a roof over his head.”…
Read more:

John Paul II and Benedict XVI
Science & Religion
Bessel van der Kolk MD 
Rational & Emotional 
Read more:

Part 4D - NAZI ABUSE OF SCIENCE -> GENOCIDE “RACIAL CLEANSING” & WAR CHILDHOOD -> CURIA - GENOCIDE of HOMOSEXUALS - - Part 4D - Homosexuality - “If it is NOT a choice, if it is NOT a disease, in the perspective of faith it can only be a GIFT” - Bishop Cruz, Brazil - ’seeks to END ‘PREJUDICES that KILL’