Thursday, January 15, 2015

“Cold-blooded Murderers”- Update 1/17/15 - Part 2 - Ghosts in the - Synod of Bishops on Family - October 2014 - Repress Unacknowledged Need for Empathy



Part 1 - Ghosts in the - Synod of Bishops on Family - October 2014 - Repress Unacknowledged Need for Empathy?
Fr. Marty Kurylowicz - September 16, 2014

Related links:

Update: Pope Francis - Homosexuals have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community... Synod of Bishops on Family - Midterm report: October 14, 2014 | Burke to Malta  - October 24, 2014

Fr Marty Kurylowicz’s - Appeal Letter Sent to Pope Francis - “Coming Out” March 1997 - Gay Catholic Priest - For Protection of Children - January 16, 2014


__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________

____________
____________________________
______________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________
____________

__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________






Part 2 - “Cold-blooded Murderers” - Ghosts in the - Synod of Bishops on Family - October 2014 - Repress Unacknowledged Need for Empathy


This entire posting was sent out as a US group mailing prior to posting here on the Thalamus Center.



Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, 
you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. 
Therefore, whoever takes the lowly position of this 
child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. 
And whoever welcomes one such child in 
my name welcomes me. 
Matthew 18: 3-5



The Vatican’s midterm report from the Synod of Bishops on Family on October 14, 2014, was an extraordinary and unprecedented expression of human empathy and validation that there are gay children growing up

This was a uniquely courageous stance to come out of the Vatican. As much human empathy that it brings to the lives of gay children - its healing presence shins back onto those who, few that they may be, risked their lives to welcome these children. The glow is forever penetrating - changing lives for the better around the world, most especially in reforming the Vatican.

Welcoming homosexual persons
Homosexuals have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community...
...homosexual unions it has to be noted that there are cases in which mutual aid to the point of sacrifice constitutes a precious support in the life of the partners. Furthermore, the Church pays special attention to the children who live with couples of the same sex, emphasizing that the needs and rights of the little ones must always be given priority...


…whoever causes one of these 
little ones 
who believe in Me to stumble, 
it would be better for him 
to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, 
and to be drowned in the 
depth of the sea. 
Matthew 18:6

Major changes to help humanity never happen in a herd - it seems they always begin with numbers as few as one, to just a few. However, it happened that someone in the Synod 2014 stood up - welcoming gay children into the midst of Church, including whoever supported this effort welcomed Christ back into the Vatican - making it holy ground, once again. It is a real sign that all those who have been and still are spiritually and intellectually involved with Pope Francis in the major reform of the Vatican - are making serious headway. It is a forward movement not based on dictatorial or authoritarian rule  - is phenomenal - a slice of heaven. And though Christ was being swept out by Cardinal Burke attempting to maintain the deadly authoritarian rule, along with his supporters,- the fact is that this presence of Christ is unforgettable. Encouraging the fact - that it is likely to be repeated again. 

However, Burke’s hostile outbursts against this midterm report Synod 2014 supporting gay children was aimed at attacking Pope Francis’s reputation, his leadership claiming - “the church is like a ship without a rudder (http://www.religionnews.com/2014/10/31/cardinal-catholic-church-pope-francis-ship-without-rudder/)” - it cast a light as far backwards highlighting this same familiar hostility that I experienced directed against me in June 1997, when I came out for the very same reason for the protection of gay children growing up. 

And for the past nearly 18 years, I suffered the severity of such hostile attacks that not even Pope Francis was able to escape from Burke - for supporting gay children (http://fathermartykurylowicz.blogspot.com/2014/11/fr-marty-kurylowiczs-appeal-letter-sent.html ---- & ---- http://fathermartykurylowicz.blogspot.com/2013/04/gay-catholic-priest-fr-marty-kurylowicz.html). 


__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________



1997 - Protecting Gay Children - Fr. Kurylowicz

In March 1997, I came out for the (1) protection of gay children growing up from the (2) lifetime harmful effects caused by antigay social and religious norms based on science and since (3) suffered the consequences of severe covert life-threatening retaliation tactics from Vatican’s curia.

2014 Synod - Supporting Gay Children - Pope Francis 

The Synod 2014 midterm report, not only echoed the same science (1) need to protect gay children, as I did by “coming out” in 1997.  They even suggested several positive factors (2) to ameliorate the harsh impact antigay social and especially religious norms. It is interesting note - how the need to support gay children still evokes the same fierce negative reactions and attacks by the curia and hierarchy in 2014 as it did to me in 1997. Cardinal Burke led the way along with the others members of the hierarchy (3) attacking Pope Francis’s reputation, including his ability as a leader (http://www.religionnews.com/2014/10/31/cardinal-catholic-church-pope-francis-ship-without-rudder/ ---- & ---- http://ncronline.org/news/faith-parish/archbishop-chaput-blasts-vatican-debate-family-says-confusion-devil). 

Curia - Publicly Proving  
Lifetime Harmful Effects - Antigay Norms
Gay Children

These harsh retaliation tactics in 1997 and in 2014 are identical that are coming from within the Curia. They are the proof of the   lifetime harmful effects that is caused by antigay social and religious norms to gay children - being played out in adulthood by the Curia members who are instigating these harsh retaliation tactics - against anyone protecting or supporting gay children. 

Victims of Roman Curia 
“Cold-blooded Murderers”
Attacking those Protecting Gay Children 1997 - 2014 

In March 1997, based on the science on homosexuality - I came out for the protection of the lives of gay children and though it was successful and maybe because I was successful at a parish level - I have suffered the hostile retaliation by members of the curia of the Vatican and outside accomplices - for the past soon to be 18 years. It is as Pope Francis described it in his December 22, 2014 address to the curia - I became - a victim of the curia’s cold blooded murders. It is not about me personally - it is the message of science of homosexuality related to gay children growing up that I made public. 

Narcissistic Rage - Need for Revenge
By Whatever Means

It was the science I dared to make public in 1997 and I was unaware that it ignited the narcissistic rage of someone in the curia to covertly - viciously begin to attack me. The midterm report from the Synod 2014 - came out supporting gay children and surprisingly it ignited the same hostile narcissistic rage only this time - it overtly began attacking Pope Francis. This “narcissistic rage is related to narcissists' need for total control of their environment, including "the need for revenge, for righting a wrong, for undoing a hurt by whatever means". (Heinz Kohut’s self psychology model, of narcissistic psychopathology -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_rage_and_narcissistic_injury).

March 29, 1997 - Parishioners Supportive of Gay Priest “coming out” for the protection of children. 
(check The Grand Rapids Press for accuracy)

June 28, 1997 - Kurylowicz Comes Out 
“...U.S. Catholic Bishops Conference states Kurylowicz” coming out to his congregation, first in a newsletter then from the pulpit on Holy Thursday, is “unprecedented.”
(check The Grand Rapids Press for accuracy)



The Synod 2014 midterm report - “protecting gay children” had evoked such overt contempt and negative reactions by some of the hierarchy and in particular by Cardinal Burke - even to attack Pope Francis, the leader of the Catholic Church.  If they can attack Pope Francis for “protecting gay children” - what chances does a gay Catholic parish priest, like me, who came out in 1997  for the “protection of gay children” have to withstand consequences of the severity of covert life-threatening retaliation tactics consistent for the past 18 years. For me - presently, after 18 years of these deadly tactics by the Curia, it has now reach the point that I am in need of immediate assistance crucial to my life from the Vatican.  I do not and will not accept charity or assistance from anyone that would defeat the purpose   that - this is a Roman Curia’s hostile and - cold-blooded murder.  Again, it is important to remember that - I am only one of many, many, many over the past 30 years. 

The sickness of “chatter, grumbling and gossip: this is a serious illness that begins simply, often just in the form of having a chat, and takes people over, turning them into sowers of discord, like Satan, and in many cases cold-blooded murderers of the reputations of their colleagues and brethren. It is the sickness of the cowardly who, not having the courage to speak directly to the people involved, instead speak behind their backs”.
Read more:


Cardinal says church under Pope Francis is a ‘rudderless ship’
October 31, 2014 
VATICAN CITY (RNS) American Cardinal Raymond Burke, the feisty former archbishop of St. Louis who has emerged as the face of the opposition to Pope Francis’ reformist agenda, likened the Roman Catholic Church to “a ship without a rudder” in a fresh attack on the pope’s leadership...
Read more:



__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________




Roman Catholic Hierarchy - Past 30 years 
Do Not Protect Children!
Child Sexual Abuse Cover-ups & Gay Children Growing Up

This midterm report expressing sincere concern for gay children - is phenomenal.  It is interesting that the importance of protecting children never seems to concern the hierarchy whether to protect children from being sexually abused or gay children growing up being abused by the lifetime harmful effects of antigay social and religious norms. Why? What might the reasons be? 

The transparency that followed in the wake of Pope Francis, especially after the Synod of Bishops on Family 2014 - revealed far more than people like Cardinal Burke intended. It brings more clarity to better answer the question, Why children have been left unprotected by the Hierarchy for the past 30 years? 

                                   Homogeneous group - Repressed Homosexuals
Roman Curia - & - Hierarchy

For the past 32 years, Benedict XVI exuded a great deal of influence in choosing members for the curia and hierarchy based on their strict obedience to doctrine including homosexuality. Resulting in, Benedict XVI, creating over the past 3 decades, likely the largest solid homogeneous group, a select population based on the unsubstantiated antigay teachings having the highest probability of containing the largest number of homophobic sexual repressed homosexuals than anywhere else in the world...
Fr Marty Kurylowicz’s - Appeal Letter Sent to Pope Francis - “Coming Out” March 1997 - Gay Catholic Priest - For Protection of Children - January 16, 2014


Roman Curia - & - Hierarchy 
Unprotected 
Gay Children - & - High School Seminarians

Considering how the members of the Roman Curia and Hierarchy were selected for the past 30 years - the simple answer why they left children unprotected is because when these men were children no one heard their cries for help. Therefore, as adults they are unable to here the cries of children who are suffering in the same they did as children.  

The Roman Curia and Hierarchy - as gay children growing up (1) no one heard their cries for protection from the lifetime harmful effects caused by antigay social and religious norms. This also includes - no one hearing (2) their cries for help as very young adolescents, while boarding at high school seminaries - where known sexual abuse of the students, by adult faculty members was going on and no one did anything to stop it. And though a student may never been assaulted sexually, but was aware of the sexual abuse was going on and no one stopped it - would be a severe form of the abuse of neglect. 

Now, as adult celibate men, well over the age of 60 years old, they are perpetuating the same kind of violence that they had experienced as children and as young teenage seminarians - when no one care enough to protect them. And due to the groups tremendous lack of academic diversity only having knowledge limited to canon law or liturgy makes the possibly of any new academic perspectives to help broaden their understanding would likely be perceived more as a threat than an aid. This is disastrous for these men to hold positions in the Church that perpetuates such life-threatening harm to children worldwide. They, though not on the part of all, demonstrated their alarming inaptitude to continue holding the positions in the Church that they do, by the remarks they made against the Synod 2014 midterm report supporting gay children growing up. It is criminally negligent. However, those who were supportive of protecting gay children in the Synod 2014 was most reassuring.  

Ghost In The Nursery 
Selma Fraiberg 1975
...These words strike a familiar note, There are many parents who have themselves lived tormented childhoods who do not inflict their pain upon their children. These are the parents who say explicitly. or in effect. "I remember what it was like....I remember how afraid I was when my father exploded I remember how I cried when they took me and my sister away to live in that home....I would never let my child go through what I went through."
For these parents, the pain and suffering have not undergone total repression. In remembering, they are saved from the blind repetition of that morbid past. Through remembering they identify with an injured child (the childhood self), while the parent who does not remember may find himself in an unconscious alliance and identification with the fearsome figures of that past. In this way. the parental past is inflicted upon the child.
The key to our ghost story appears to lie in the fate of affects in childhood. Our hypothesis is that access to childhood pain becomes a powerful deterrent while repression and isolation of painful affect provide the psychological requirements for identification with the betrayers and aggressors. The unsolved mystery is why under conditions of extremity, in early childhood, some children who later become parents keep pain alive; they do not make the fateful alliance with the aggressor which defends the child's ego against intolerable danger and obliterates the conscious experience of anxiety. We hope to explore these problems in further study...
Selma Fraiberg - Professor of Child Psychoanalysis and director of the Child Development Project, 
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108
Read more:


Alice Miller
In For Your Own Good (1980), she introduced the concept of "poisonous pedagogy" to describe the child-rearing practices that were so prevalent in Europe, especially before the second world war. She believed that the pain inflicted on children – "for their own good" – was unconsciously the parent re-enacting the trauma that had been inflicted on them when they were children. Thus the cycle of trauma continued down the generations.
She analysed the childhoods of several famous figures in order to prove her point, the best known being Adolf Hitler. In her view, all Hitler's atrocities could be explained by the brutal persecution and abuse he experienced as a child. It is here that Miller was at her most powerful. She brought the reality of child abuse to the foreground in a way that many found compelling. She described how children protect their parents in order to salvage some hope of having their needs fulfilled and in the process have to repress their true needs.
Long-term suffering could be avoided only, in her opinion, if the child had an adult in his or her life who could acknowledge the reality of their experience. She called these adults "empathic witnesses" and this acknowledgment, she said, not interpretation, should be the role of psychotherapists with their clients...
Read more:


FOR YOUR OWN GOOD
Hidden cruelty in child-rearing and the roots of violence (1980)
By Alice Miller
...In the earliest stage of life, it is possible for a child to forget about the extreme acts of cruelty he or she has endured and to idealize their perpetrator. But the nature of the subsequent enactment reveals that the whole history of early persecution was stored up somewhere; the drama now unfolds in front of the spectators with an amazing resemblance to the original situation but under another guise: in the reenactment, the child who was once persecuted now becomes the persecutor...
Read more:




__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________





March 1997 - & - October 2014 - Hierarchy 
Proof Lifetime Harm 

In March 1997, I came out for the protection of gay children from the lifetime harmful effects caused by antigay social and religious norms. The Synod of Bishops 2014 reiterated the same need for the protection of gay children growing up, however, they did not included the part about the lifetime harmful effects caused to gay children by antigay social and religious norms, as I did in March 1997. But the strong opposition expressed against the midterm report of even the idea of welcoming of gay children, especially led by Burke, was living proof of how the lifetime harmful effects are played out in adulthood, among the majority of the members of the hierarchy.  

No Explanation or Reason 
Emotional Outburst 

What is key here is that there is no story or explanation - to match the intense emotional reaction regarding topic of gay children. Such intense reactions without a clear explanation why  - tends to point to something happening in early childhood that has been repressed. As opposed to an event that happens in adulthood - like someone refusing to ride in the front seat of a car, because that person was in a severe car accident and got thrown through the windshield ( Henry Krystal - PDF http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibrarian.net%2Fnavon%2Fpaper%2FChapter_8__Psychoanalytic_Approaches_to_Trauma__A.pdf%3Fpaperid%3D16436404&ei=GF21VNXKA9SqyASwnoDYBA&usg=AFQjCNHw0P8nuU0GEYdZs0ItaQKDfe2GLA&bvm=bv.83339334,d.aWw). 


Science on Homosexuality 
Rejected 
Rainforest - Climate Control 
Accepted 
????????????????

Why? The intense emotional and adamant refusal to enter into any open discussion on the topic of gay children growing up, regarding the need to support them and their parents is alarming. What is their fear?  It is alarming because they give no valid reasoning from science or the bible for so fiercely refusing to enter into any open dialogue. This is especially alarming, because they deliberately and completely exclude the science on homosexual sexual orientation. What profession in the world is can exclude the science they do no agree with or does not fit their perspective? However, this is exactly what Hitler and the Nazi Party did - though not only excluding the science, but also removing the scientists themselves who did not fit in with their ideology. 

As long as the hierarchy is allowed to exclude the science, so vital to the lives of gay children, makes it hypocritical to call out global corporations for not accepting the science on climate control in order to protect the poor. 



RATZINGER/BENEDICT XVI 
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith 
preventing evolution in church teaching toward acceptance of homosexual conduct.
Ignoring Science - Sanctions Ignorance & Silence 
Promoting discrimination of Homosexuality 
 A Timeline



Benedict XVI - spent 30 years suppressing the evolving science on homosexual sexual orientation that fines that homosexual orientation is a normal and natural part of human sexual development. He and along with people like Cardinal Burke have aggressively attacked anyone in the Church who open discussed the emerging science on homosexuality. This includes - someone like me - for coming out in 1997 for the protection of gay children that was based on the science of homosexuality. I am still, as a diocesan gay priest, waiting for, though not limited to - justice, financial compensation for being denied salary for the past 18 years, including to lethal harm to my reputation, health and the lost of productively of 18 years. I am only one of many, many, many - people in the Church who have been attacked for speaking for the protection of gay people - based authoritative science that has been emerging for the past 6 decades. 

In 1957, Evelyn Hooker’s most notable and ground breaking research proving that homosexuality is not a mental illness was completed in 1957 called - 

"The Adjustment of the Male Overt Homosexual" in which she administered several psychological tests to groups of self-identified male homosexuals and heterosexuals and asked experts to identify the homosexuals and rate their mental health. The experiment, which other researchers subsequently repeated, argues that homosexuality is not a mental disorder, as there was no detectable difference between homosexual and heterosexual men in terms of mental adjustment...
Read more:


Regardless, of the compelling authoritative science on homosexuality compiling for the past 6 decades - Benedict came out on December 22, 2008 making headlines - 
“Homosexuality is as great a threat as rainforest destruction, says Pope (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1100422/Homosexuality-great-threat-rainforest-destruction-says-Pope.html).” 



Sole Interpreter of Bible
Galileo 

Objectivity is lost when the curia arbitrarily assumes to be the sole source to interpret the bible. This is what caused the curia’s error in judgment in Galileo’s case, because their interpretations the bible were biased to fit the unchallenged sacred traditional constructs. This ironclad bias of the curia - is what prevents the free search for truth.  

...Without the freedom of expression of ideas, the Vatican then becomes tightly insulated from any new knowledge that challenges their interpretations, which leads the Vatican to -  rejecting the scientific findings of its time. 
(Jerome J. Langford, O.P., “Galileo, Science and the Church” The University of Michigan Press, Michigan, 1992)


Pope Francis Christmas  -  Roman Curia - 2014 
Narcissistic Psychopathology

Pope Francis’s Christmas message to the Roman Curia on December 22, 2014 regarding making “a real examination of conscience” he describes many aspects that appear close, to the symptoms of Heinz Kohut’s self psychology model, of narcissistic psychopathology. This is the result of the lack of parental empathic caring during early childhood psychological development. 
&


In brief, one likely possibility could be caused by early childhood traumatic experiences growing up gay - when a gay child is being subjected, in varying degrees of severity, to antigay social and religious norms. This would cause the destruction of the psychological development of the self. The gay child - instead of growing up to be a separate individual - sacrifices his individuality - to become what appears to be acceptable to the his parents for fear of abandonment. For a child - the fear of being abandoned can be traumatic and the child will do anything in order to stop this overwhelming feeling of being abandoned. Photo 



Need for Revenge by Whatever Means Narcissistic Rage
Kohut and Self Psychology

...For Kohut, narcissistic rage is related to narcissists' need for total control of their environment, including "the need for revenge, for righting a wrong, for undoing a hurt by whatever means". It is an attempt by the narcissist to turn from a passive sense of victimization to an active role in giving pain to others, while at the same time attempting to rebuild their own (actually false) sense of self-worth. It may also involve self-protection and preservation, with rage serving to restore a sense of safety and power by destroying that which had threatened the narcissist...
Read more:

Cold-blooded Murderers
...Cold-blooded Murderers of the reputations of their colleagues and brethren. It is the sickness of the cowardly who, not having the courage to speak directly to the people involved, instead speak behind their backs”.

__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________




Sexual Orientation & Empathy 

This kind of severe disruptions to the natural and normal development of a child’s sexual orientation - whether heterosexual or homosexual - has proven to cause lifelong lasting harmful effects - disrupting the child’s ability to form life long lasting relationships. Sexual orientation is directly related to a child’s development of human empathy - the ability to love and to be loved - to feel one with another. 

When parents are disapproving of a gay child’s expression of love for someone of the same sex - it will also be destroying a child’s ability to empathize with others. Parents make the devastating mistake to assume that a gay child has any understanding of an adult distorted understanding what it means to be gay. Parents will often look to the Catholic Church for guidance in order to give the very best instructions to their gay child. 

And instead of the parents of a gay child getting - what they  believe is the best guidance - they are in fact getting the most life-threatening advice possible. Because if the parents follow the Vatican’s unsubstantiated antigay teachings their gay children are more than likely to turn out, in extreme cases to turn out like Cardinal Burke or like the members of the Roman Curia.  

Parents of Roman Curia 

The members of the Roman Curia are more than likely - prime examples of this kind of lifetime harm caused by their parents’ faithfulness in enforcing these Vatican’s unsubstantiated antigay teachings children. And we can also see how it has becomes a self-perpetuation of violence. The Synod 2014 midterm report welcoming gay children is a real sign of hope to reverse this human atrocity. 

Pope Francis’s descriptions 
Roman Curia

Pope Francis’s descriptions of the Roman Curia "spiritual Alzheimer's," "excessively busy,” "rivalry and vainglory,” “indifference,” “accumulation,” “worldly profit and exhibitionism,” are the only things left to a gay child when a child has been raised not fall in love or somehow the child’s idea of love was wrong (http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/12/22/pope_francis_christmas_greetings_to_curia/1115668). Photo 

Yes, we are looking at lives lived without being allowed to fall in love. I do not know what more evidence is needed to prove - how extremely harmful for life the Vatican's unsubstantiated antigay teachings are to gay children growing up. The fact is no one heard their cries for help of the Roman Curia or the Hierarchy - as gay children growing up and therefore they will not hear to cries of gay children today. 

Because in order to attempt to hear the cries of gay children today - they would have to admitted to the extreme cruelty they face as gay children growing up.  It would likely in many cases be a destruction that their family lives were less that perfect. 

Extreme Sense of Emptiness
Roman Curia

So yes, there is in the Roman Curia, though not of their own doing - an extreme sense of emptiness, and an overwhelming feelings of envy, because they were always living out someone’s else ideas of what they should be doing - and they were not allowed be in the driver seat forming their own lives. Making their own mistakes and learning to do better and feel the joy and satisfaction of using all that is within them to succeed at something of their own choosing. From this vantage point there is no envy, because they are totally involved in their own lives that is totally unique - not like anyone else. There is no comparisons with others. 

Instead, they were half heartedly following someone’s else script for them and without love. They were praised for their striving for materials things and careers, because these were the only things that were valued by their parents - not for the loving anyone. It tends to lead to different levels of narcissistic rage - to a sense of  mean-spiritedness - especially in attacking gay people that exemplified in Cardinal Burke antigay attacks. 

Of course the above is not true of everyone and it is only a very brief explanation of a considerably complex understanding of self psychology. 



__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________



Benedict XVI - 1993
Early Childhood Trauma 
Six Years Old  

It is the extraordinary insight that the wake of Pope Francis
transparency efforts to reform the Vatican, especially with the midterm report of the Synod of Bishops on Family 2014 concerns for supporting gay children that is altering previously conceived ideas.  However, all the needed reforms are linked back to early childhood traumatizing events. It gives a deeper understanding though more severe to how Pope Benedict XVI grew up in Nazi Germany, at the age of six years old, in 1933 and how that harsh mistreatment played itself out in his years at the Vatican. 

From mere historical observations of where and when Benedict XVI was born - it would not be a unreasonable to consider the fact that he was a child victim of multiple forms of child abuse, as countless other children due to Hitler’s and the Nazi Party’s ideologies. 

Education in the Nazi State
Education in the Third Reich served to indoctrinate students with the National Socialist world view. Nazi scholars and educators glorified Nordic and other “Aryan” races, while denigrating Jews and other so-called inferior peoples as parasitic “bastard races” incapable of creating culture or civilization. After 1933, the Nazi regime purged the public school system of teachers deemed to be Jews or to be “politically unreliable.” Most educators, however, remained in their posts and joined the National Socialist Teachers League. 97% of all public school teachers, some 300,000 persons, had joined the League by 1936. In fact, teachers joined the Nazi Party in greater numbers than any other profession.
In the classroom and in the Hitler Youth, instruction aimed to produce race-conscious, obedient, self-sacrificing Germans who would be willing to die for Führer and Fatherland. Devotion to Adolf Hitler was a key component of Hitler Youth training. German young people celebrated his birthday (April 20)-a national holiday-for membership inductions. German adolescents swore allegiance to Hitler and pledged to serve the nation and its leader as future soldiers.
Schools played an important role in spreading Nazi ideas to German youth. While censors removed some books from the classroom, German educators introduced new textbooks that taught students love for Hitler, obedience to state authority, militarism, racism, and antisemitism. Photo
From their first days in school, German children were imbued with the cult of Adolf Hitler. His portrait was a standard fixture in classrooms. Textbooks frequently described the thrill of a child seeing the German leader for the first time.
Board games and toys for children served as another way to spread racial and political propaganda to German youth. Toys were also used as propaganda vehicles to indoctrinate children into militarism...
Read more



1930s and 1950s 
Racial Purity & Play Fair 

While other children like myself born in the 1950s were being taught in school - how we must respect and play fair with all children - Benedict XVI, as a school child - was taught that some children are dangerous like rats and must be avoided (even exterminated for the safety of society). Hitler and the Nazi Party exploited Germany’s children.  Hitler immediately had school children, starting as young 5 and 6 years of age - constantly drilled on the idea of racial purity.  Germany school children who did not meet the ideal of the Arian race - were by some sources - simply removed from school never to be seen again. 



Background Information:

Pope Benedict XVI 
Background and childhood (1927–1943)
Joseph Alois Ratzinger was born on 16 April (Holy Saturday) 1927 at 11 Schulstrasse, his parents' home in Marktl am Inn, Bavaria and baptised on the same day. He was the third and youngest child of Joseph Ratzinger, Sr., a police officer, and his wife, Maria...His father served in both the Bavarian State Police (Landespolizei) and the German national Regular Police (Ordnungspolizei) before retiring in 1937 to the town of Traunstein. The Sunday Times described the older Ratzinger as "an anti-Nazi whose attempts to rein in Hitler's Brown Shirts forced the family to move several times." According to the International Herald Tribune, these relocations were directly related to Joseph Ratzinger, Sr.'s continued resistance to Nazism, which resulted in demotions and transfers. The pope's brother Georg said: "Our father was a bitter enemy of Nazism because he believed it was in conflict with our faith". The family encountered the Nazi regime's euthanasia program for the handicapped. John Allen, a Ratzinger biographer, reports a revelation made by Cardinal Ratzinger at a conference in the Vatican on 28 November 1996: "Ratzinger had a cousin with Down's Syndrome who in 1941 was 14 years old. This cousin was just a few months younger than Ratzinger and was taken away by the Nazi authorities for "therapy". Not long afterwards, the family received word that he was dead, presumably one of the 'undesirables' eliminated during that time."...
Read more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_life_of_Pope_Benedict_XVI




1933
Himmler - Reorganized the Police of Bavaria
Joseph Ratzinger, Sr - Bavarian State Police




Gestapo (Nazi political police) -- Encyclopedia Britannica
.....When the Nazis came to power in 1933, Hermann Göring, then Prussian minister of the interior, detached the political and espionage units from the regular Prussian police, filled their ranks with thousands of Nazis, and, on April 26, 1933, reorganized them under his personal command as the Gestapo. Simultaneously, Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS, the Nazi paramilitary corps, together with his aide Reinhard Heydrich, similarly reorganized the police of Bavaria and the remaining German states...
...The Gestapo operated without civil restraints. It had the authority of “preventative arrest,” and its actions were not subject to judicial appeal. Thousands of leftists, intellectuals, Jews, trade unionists, political clergy, and homosexuals simply disappeared into concentration camps after being arrested by the Gestapo... 
Read more:


Pope Benedict XVI
...Ratzinger's family, especially his father, bitterly resented the Nazis, and his father's opposition to Nazism resulted in demotions and harassment of the family. Following his 14th birthday in 1941, Ratzinger was conscripted into the Hitler Youth—as membership was required by law for all 14-year-old German boys after March 1939—but was an unenthusiastic member who refused to attend meetings, according to his brother. In 1941, one of Ratzinger's cousins, a 14-year-old boy with Down syndrome, was taken away by the Nazi regime and murdered during the Action T4 campaign of Nazi eugenics.[15] In 1943, while still in seminary, he was drafted into the German anti-aircraft corps as Luftwaffenhelfer. Ratzinger then trained in the German infantry.[16] As the Allied front drew closer to his post in 1945, he deserted back to his family's home in Traunstein after his unit had ceased to exist, just as American troops established a headquarters in the Ratzinger household. As a German soldier, he was interned in a prisoner of war camp, but released a few months later at the end of the war in May 1945...
Read more:


FINAL SOLUTIONS: MURDEROUS RACIAL HYGIENE, 1939–1945
...The first victims were German infants and children. The Reich Ministry of the Interior instructed midwives and physicians to register all children born with severe birth defects. Three expert physicians evaluated each case and, usually without seeing the potential victims, selected those to be killed. Officials deceived the children’s families by providing falsified causes of death. From 1939 to 1945, more than 5,000 boys and girls were killed in some 30 special children’s wards established at state hospitals and clinics...
Read more:





Benedict XVI - 10 years old - Himmler - 1937
Homosexuals, Abortion & Birth Control

Destruction of Mankind”

An unchecked expansion of the 
phenomenon of homosexuality would lead 
quite literally to the “destruction of mankind” 
(Untergang der Menschheit). 
Herwig Hartner 
Heinrich Himmler 1927 read Hartner




Benedict XVI at the age of 10, would likely have heard rumblings from - Heinrich Himmler’s speeches that homosexuals, abortion and people who practice birth control were also a serious threat to the nation. These three issues were Benedict XVI obsessions that he relentlessly had the hierarchy preach against (http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/pwh/naziviews.asp).

Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis
Robert N. Proctor 
Harvard University Press 1988 - Review
...After 1910, the field of racial hygiene starts to explode in Germany. With its primary concern being fears centered on the degeneration of the race, numerous organizations and journals were started and articles were written espousing the need to do something about the current trends in births and birth control. At this time, the need for increasing desirable births and the necessity to limit births of the undesirable was being given great attention in addition to the fears associated with the overall declining birthrate in Germany... 
Read more:
Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis
By Robert Proctor, 1988


THE BATTLE FOR BIRTHS
In 1936 the Reich Central Office for Combating Homosexuality and Abortion was established to step up efforts to prevent acts that obstructed reproduction. In a 1937 speech linking homosexuality to a falling birthrate, German police chief Heinrich Himmler stated: “A people of good race which has too few children has a one-way ticket to the grave.”



Heinrich Himmler - a military commander, and a leading member of the Nazi Party of Nazi Germany... Photo

Heinrich Himmler (1900-1945) was the Reich Leader (Reichsführer) of the dreaded SS of the Nazi party from 1929 until 1945. Himmler presided over a vast ideological and bureaucratic empire that defined him for many—both inside and outside the Third Reich—as the second most powerful man in Germany during World War II. Given overall responsibility for the security of the Nazi empire, Himmler was the key and senior Nazi official responsible for conceiving and overseeing implementation of the so-called Final Solution, the Nazi plan to murder the Jews of Europe...
Read more:
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007407




Homosexuals & the Holocaust:
Himmler Speech on the “Question of Homosexuality”
(February 18, 1937)



Homosexuals, Genocide of in the Holocaust
...The Nazi purge of homosexuals from their own ranks was only the beginning. On June 23, 1935, the first anniversary of the Roehm killings, the Nazis began a legal campaign against homosexuals by adding to paragraph 175 another law, 175a, which created ten new criminal offenses including kisses between men, embraces, even homosexual fantasies. 
The Gestapo and the SS, under the notoriously antihomosexual leadership of Heinrich Himmler, became involved in a stepped up campaign to work gays to death in the camps. Himmler is quoted as follows: "Just as we today have gone back to the ancient Germanic view of the question of marriage mixing different races, so too in our judgment of homosexuality  a symptom of degeneracy that could destroy our race  we must return to the guiding Nordic principle: extermination." Reich Legal Director, Hans Frank, commented on the new penal code: "Particular attention should be addressed to homosexuality, which is clearly expressive of a disposition opposed to the normal national community ... Homosexual behavior, in particular, merits no mercy."
Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies
University of Minnesota
Read more:


Benedict XVI - born April 16, 1927
1933 -  6 years old
1934 -  7 years old
1935 -  8 years old
1936 -  9 years old
1937 - 10 years old
1939 - 12 years old

HOMOSEXUALS: VICTIMS OF THE NAZI ERA
...On May 6, 1933, Nazis ransacked the “Institute for Sexual Science” in Berlin; four days later as part of large public burnings of books viewed as “un-German,” thousands
of books plundered from the Institute’s library were thrown into a huge bonfire...
In 1934, a special Gestapo (Secret State Police) division on homosexuals was set up. One of its first acts was to order the police “pink lists” from all over Germany.
The police had been compiling these lists of suspected homosexual men since 1900. On September 1, 1935, a harsher, amended version of Paragraph 175 of the Criminal Code, originally framed in 1871, went into effect, punishing a broad range of “lewd and lascivious” behavior between men. In 1936 Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler created a Reich Central Office for the Combating of Homosexuality and Abortion: Special Office (II S), a subdepartment of Executive Department II of the Gestapo. The linking of homosexuality and abortion reflected the Nazi regime’s population policies to promote a higher birthrate of its “Aryan” population. On this subject, Himmler spoke in Bad Tölz on February 18, 1937, before a group of high-ranking SS officers on the dangers both homosexuality and abortion posed to the German birthrate.
Under the revised Paragraph 175 and the creation of Special Office II S, the number of prosecutions increased sharply, peaking in the years 1937–1939. Half of all convictions for homosexual activity under the Nazi regime occurred during these years. The police stepped up raids on homosexual meeting places, seized address books of arrested men to find addi- tional suspects, and created networks of informers to compile lists of names and make arrests...
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
Washington D.C.
Read more:



The Denial of Homosexuality: Same-Sex Incidents in Himmler's SS and Police
Geoffrey J. Giles
...As the leader of the SS and the police, Himmler himself deserves special attention. His speeches and writings dealt more obsessively with homosexuality than did those of any other Nazi leader, and his comments were broadly consistent in their sharp condemnation of homosexuality. On several documented occasions between 1934 and 1943, Himmler spoke or wrote of the acceptability, even the desirability, of killing homosexuals...
Read more:


Why Bother About Homosexuals? Homophobia and Sexual Politics in Nazi Germany
Geoffrey J. Giles 2001 - PDF 
...During September and October 1927 Himmler read Herwig Hartner’s book Erotik und Rasse (Eroticism and Race)...
...Hartner’s book contained a section specifically on homosexuality, centering not on literature, but on the scientific and political work of Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld. Hartner’s thesis was that an unchecked expansion of the phenomenon of homosexuality would lead quite literally to the “destruction of mankind” (Untergang der Menschheit). He lost himself in speculation about a giant conspiracy, inspired of course by Jews, among whom there was “contrary to Hirschfeld’s assertion, a greater [proportion of homosexuals] by far than in the German population” as a whole. What was the aim of these Jewish homosexuals? They were trying to push Germany down the slippery slope of “increasing infertility” that the French had been sliding down for ages. You may well wonder whether, if more homosexuals meant fewer babies, that would not have an equally or even more damaging effect on the “heavily homosexual” Jewish people...Hartner declared in a closing flourish to his chapter that this spread of homosexuality would “surely dig our graves.” One can almost sense young Himmler (still only twenty-seven years old) shuddering in agreement with these sentiments.
Hartner denied that homosexuality was brought about either as a result of boredom following too much sex with women, or by any other moral decadence, but rather he ascribed organic roots to the phenomenon. The idea that this was a natural drive over which the individual had no control in fact followed the thinking of that staunch defender of homosexuals, Magnus Hirschfeld himself. Yet Hartner was not about to defend homosexuals, even if they could not help themselves. What was to be done? The first thing, insisted Hartner, was not to allow people to act out their (homo)sexual impulses. This was a suggestion with which Himmler, already believably disturbed by the thought that Blüher’s comments on homoeroticism hit a little too close to home, would have fully agreed. Since the very “destruction of mankind” threatened to occur if homosexuals were to have their way, firm measures were called for. After all, “criminal tendencies, too, can be innate (angeboren), but it is still a duty for the self-preservation of human communities to take forcible precautionary measures against these equally natural urges.”
Read more:



Saving the world from homosexuality is like saving rainforests Pope - 12/24/08
In a clear reference to homosexuality, the 82-year-old Pope told top priests that the failure to respect the union between a man and a woman amounted to the "auto destruction of mankind", Mail online reported on Tuesday.

Homosexuality is as great a threat as rainforest destruction, says Pope - 23 December 2008
'The tropical forests deserve our protection, but man as a creature deserves it no less.'
In a clear reference to homosexuality, he said the failure to respect the union between a man and a woman amounted to the 'auto destruction of mankind'. 

Pope wants humanity 'saved' from homosexuality - December 23, 2008
Pope Benedict XVI says saving humanity from homosexual or transsexual behaviour is just as important as saving the rainforest from destruction...

Pope says humanity needs 'saving' from homosexuality - December 23, 2008
Pope Benedict XVI sparked a furious reaction from other Christian groups as he also suggested that a blurring of the distinction between male and female could lead to the "self-destruction" of the human race...




AUSCHWITZ - CHRISTMAS 2008 
A flashback far more severe than in BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN 
December 26, 2008 
by - Fr. Marty Kurylowicz

...And when I heard what Pope Benedict XVI said about homosexuals and transgendered human beings at Christmas 2008, I felt that same trauma all over again. Because in some way, somehow, he was conveying in a non-verbal manner the horror of the Holocaust, in what appears to be a traumatized, trance-like, accepted social norm from that period of time dictating that some people just don’t count, aren’t important, and can be easily disposed of. And if you rock the boat, you could be next to be disposed of...

...It seemed like the same kind of horror, a tacit assumption that some people don't count and can be disposed of without remorse. Could it be that Benedict XVI is unconsciously repeating Hitler's crime against humanity by taking on a long-accepted social attitude from that period of time?

The question I asked myself was: what would it have been like for someone growing up gay during the Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals 1933 -1945? 

What would be the severity of the psychological effects on a boy who grew up to be gay in Germany during the time of Hitler’s NAZI PERSECUTION OF HOMOSEXUALS 1933 -1945? During the Nazi regime, homosexuals were publicly defamed and falsely accused for the major social problems of that time, which was done to incite massive public hatred and hostility directed against homosexuals. Homosexuals were used for medical experiments, physically mutilated, brutally tortured and exterminated.

Would this child, as an adult, in a severe dissociated state of mind from his own homosexual feelings (Harry Stack Sullivan MD, Dissociative Processes, Clinical Studies on Psychiatry (1956)), unconsciously perpetuate the terrifying horror of the insensitivity he had experienced growing up? If he found himself in a position of authority would he recreate the same social and political environment of violence and terror for homosexuals that he experienced, as a child who grew up to be gay, during the NAZI PERSECUTION OF HOMOSEXUALS?...
Fr. Marty Kurylowicz



While school children like myself were taught to respect all knowledge - learn everything - we could. Benedict XVI, as a student was taught that some science subjects that did not agree Nazi ideology were simply not considered as important and could be dismissed. 



Protect Children and the 
Rest of the World will be Safe



Childhood Trauma, Neurobiology... Development of the Brain:
Infant Mental Health Journal, Vol. 16, No. 4, Winter 1995
  Adults interpret the actions, words, and expressions of children through the distorting fitter of their own beliefs. In the lives of most infants and children, these common adult misinterpretations are relatively benign. In many cases, however, these misinterpretations can be destructive. The most dramatic example occurs when the impact of traumatic events on infants and young children is minimized. It is an ultimate irony that at the time when the human is most vulnerable to the effects of trauma— during infancy and childhood— adults generally presume the most resilience...
  ...Deprivation of critical experiences during development may be the most destructive yet least understood area of child maltreatment. Unlike broken bones, irreversible maldevelopment of brain areas mediating empathy resulting from emotional neglect in infancy and childhood is not readily observable...
  ...Some of the most powerful clinical examples of this phenomenon are related to lack of attachment experiences early in life. The child who has been emotionally neglected early in life will exhibit profound attachment problems which are extremely insensitive to any replacement experiences later, including therapy. Examples of this include feral children, children in orphanages observed by Spitz and Wolf (1945) and, often, the remorseless, violent child...
  ...Profound sociocultural and public policy implications arise from understanding the critical role of early experience in determining the functional capacity of the mature adult — and therefore our society. Persistence of the destructive myth that "children are resilient" will prevent millions of children, and our society, from meeting their true potential. Persistence of the pervasive maltreatment of children in the face of decreasing global and national resources will lead, inevitably, to sociocultural devolution.
It need not be so.
Read more:





__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________






New Transparency - Synod 2014 - Benedict XVI 
Reassessing

Benedict XVI spent is first 18 years of life under Hitler’s and the Nazi Party’s regime - what chances did he have of learning anything else ( -  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_life_of_Pope_Benedict_XVI -- & ---  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Benedict_XVI -) The new transparency of the Vatican, especially at the Synod 2014 regarding supporting gay children and Burke’s emotional outbursts gives a deeper insight into the organizational structure of the Vatican and Benedict XVI involvement. It reveals a much greater complexity on many different levels regarding the whole situation - making any judgments is quite useless at this time. This is especially true for Benedict XVI. What seems most important, now, is to try to understand just what has happened for the past three decades. It all still appears to be quite elusive for even those in the curia and hierarchy to fully understand. 


Escalation of Curia’s Violence Against Gays  1981 - 2014
“Cumulative Radicalization"

In considering the above, it would be expected to find some similarities and - in one area there is the “cumulative radicalization." Professor Ian Kershaw, is a leading expert in the study of Hitler and the Nazi Party. Kershaw describes the meaning of the term “cumulative radicalization," as related to Nazi Germany under the leadership of Hitler. It was because of Hitler’s lack of involvement in the daily bureaucratic operations of governing that allowed the goals of the Nazi Party to become increasingly irrational and Kershaw found this to be characteristic of Nazi Germany. 

Vatileaks & Watergate = Not Very Bright Men
“Follow the Money”

The Vatileaks indicated the same lack of involvement of Benedict XVI in the daily bureaucratic operations of the curia (http://www.npr.org/2012/06/02/154093529/conspiracies-swirl-as-vatican-scandal-engulfs-rome%20---%20&%20---%20http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/pope-benedict-focuses-). His absence, like Nazi Germany, also allowed Cardinal Bertone and Cardinal Burke to set goals that were increasingly irrational causing many human atrocities. They are reminiscent of the men of Watergate - not very bright and got drunk on power and of course there is the moneyWho is on whose - payroll or payrolls?

In a 1993 essay "Working Towards the Führer", Kershaw argued that the German and Soviet dictatorships had more differences than similarities. Kershaw argued that Hitler was a very unbureaucratic leader who was highly averse to paper work in marked contrast to Stalin. Likewise, Kershaw argued that Stalin was highly involved in the running of the Soviet Union in contrast to Hitler whose involvement in day-to-day decision making was limited, infrequent and capricious. Kershaw argued that the Soviet regime, despite all of its extreme brutality and utter ruthlessness, was basically rational in its goal of seeking to modernise a backward country and had no equivalent of the "cumulative radicalization" towards increasingly irrational goals that Kershaw sees as characteristic of Nazi Germany...
Read more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Kershaw#cite_note-5



...Some Catholic business leaders have complained about Francis’ emphasis on income inequality and the defects of capitalism. Kenneth G. Langone, the billionaire co-founder of the Home Depot and a major Republican donor, warned Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York that if the pope kept up the drumbeat, some wealthy Catholics might stop giving to church causes...
Read more:






__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________






People Loved Darkness
Cardinal Burke

There has been an escalation over the the past 30 years - in of the intensity of attacking gay people, suppressing all the evolving science on homosexuality, silencing of anyone in the Church who spoke openly on the topic, and involving accomplices. Benedict XVI started his antigay crusade beginning 1981 and enlisting clerics into the curia who would follow his orders. Cardinal Burke was placed in power since 1989. 


This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but 
people loved darkness instead of light because 
their deeds were evil. Everyone who does 
evil hates the light, and will not come 
into the light for fear that their 
deeds will be exposed. 
John 3:19-20


Cruel & Demeaning Public Tactic
Intimidation

Benedict XVI, as Cardinal Ratzinger started cracking down on those helping gay people - beginning with Archbishop Hunthausen. Whether or not it was intentional - it was the first Apostolic Visitation - to gain US national news media attention. It was stated at the time, that Ratzinger’s investigation of Hunthausen was a cruel and demeaning public tactic used against Hunthausen to intimidate his fellow prelates. However, this intimidation tacit has remained constant until possibly, now?  I was informed this harsh retaliation tacit existed after I came out in 1997.  


Conflict in the Catholic Hierarchy : 
a study of coping strategies in the Hunthausen affair, 
with preferential attention to discursive strategies
by Timothy Peter Schilling - 2003
Conflicts within the Roman Catholic hierarchy poses risks to the organizational effectiveness of the Church, but the hierarchy’s approach to conflict handling has rarely been subjected to systematic, empirically grounded study...
Read more:




Rigidity to Doctrine
Groupthink 

There was considerable criticism made about the people Cardinal Ratzinger picked to work for him, the only qualification required was their rigidity to doctrine. Over the past 30 years, this has greatly decreased the intellectual level of the curia and hierarchy which is quite evident today, their inability to view situations from multiple academic perspectives. It was the formation of a most deadly form of the process known as groupthink (http://web.stanford.edu/group/scie/Career/Wisdom/groupthink1.htm).  Pope Francis has improved this deficit by bringing in a diversity of colleagues, consultants and experts to assist him in reforming the Vatican Bank and curia, including strongly encouraging and promoting open dialogue on every subject.  

Secrecy

There was also criticism regarding their ever increasing use of secrecy preferring to hide from public view and to act with bureaucratic anonymity - thus avoiding any public oversight (http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/601). This was the secrecy and bureaucratic anonymity that Cardinal Burke had grown use to over the past 25 years. This has been greatly reduced by Pope Francis’s process of reforming the curia and including removing Burke from all positions of power. 


However, with all due respect, Alcatraz would had been a better assignment for Burke, than Malta.  At least he would be in the USA, and one day he would have to face federal persecution for his countless hate crimes against gay adults and gay children. It would be a reverse of the intimidation tactic that he used to suppress any open dialogue on the science and biblical interpretations on homosexual sexual orientation. Photo Photo


Crackdown - Hunthausen - 1980s 
“Amateurs-turned-theologians”

During Apostolic Visitation of Archbishop Hunthausen of the 1980s, Archbishop Weakland in 1986 - made the statement that the only qualification for choosing clerics to work curia was their rigidity to doctrine that they were: 

He contended that previous efforts to monitor and safeguard Catholic doctrine have been undertaken in an atmosphere where “amateurs-turned-theologians easily became headhunters and leaders were picked (on the basis of) the rigidity of their doctrine, so that often second-rate and repressive minds, riding on the waves of fear, took over.
``Religion under such circumstances then can become an ideology that tolerates no obstacle and that values ideas more than people,”...
Read more:



Conformity = Obedience &  Enthusiasm

Commentary

After shock? Towards a social identity explanation of the Milgram ‘obedience’ studies
Stephen Reicher and S. Alexander Haslam
__________________________________________
British Journal of Social Psychology (2011), 50, 163–169
 2011 The British Psychological Society

...This is something Russell (2011) alerts us to in detailing Milgram’s sensitivity to both (1) the authenticity and quality of his accomplices [e.g., the importance of having a learner who ‘is mild and submissive; not at all academic’; 2011, p. 20], and (2) the ‘binding factors’ [such as the experimenter’s status] that help put the participant under the experimenter’s influence...
Read more:


Human obedience: The myth of blind conformity 
November 20, 2012
In the 1960s and 1970s, classic social psychological studies were conducted that provided evidence that even normal, decent people can engage in acts of extreme cruelty when instructed to do so by others. However, in an essay published November 20 in the open access journal PLOS Biology, Professors Alex Haslam and Stephen Reicher revisit these studies' conclusions and explain how awful acts involve not just obedience, but enthusiasm too -- challenging the long-held belief that human beings are 'programmed' for conformity...
...Professor Haslam, from the University of Queensland, argues that tyranny does not result from blind conformity to rules and roles. Rather, it is a creative act of followership, resulting from identifying with authorities who represent vicious acts as virtuous.
"Decent people participate in horrific acts not because they become passive, mindless functionaries who do not know what they are doing, but rather because they come to believe -- typically under the influence of those in authority -- that what they are doing is right," Professor Haslam explained.
Professor Reicher, of the University of St Andrews, added that it is not that they were blind to the evil they were perpetrating, but rather that they knew what they were doing, and believed it to be right...
Read more:
&



Stanley Milgram’s (1974) study of obedience

BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE
STANLEY MILCRAM 
Yak University
This article describes a procedure for the study of destructive obedience in the laboratory...
Read more:


Obeying and Resisting Malevolent Orders
Stanley Milgram's famous experiment highlights the powerful human tendency to obey authority.
Practical Application
Milgram's discovery about the unexpectedly powerful human tendency to obey authorities can be applied to real life in several different ways. First, it provides a reference point for certain phenomena that, on the face of it, strain our understanding-thereby, making them more plausible. Clearly, the implications of Milgram's research have been greatest for understanding of the Holocaust. For example, a historian, describing the behavior of a Nazi mobile unit roaming the Polish countryside that killed 38,000 Jews in cold blood at the bidding of their commander, concluded that "many of Milgram's insights find graphic confirmation in the behavior and testimony of the men of Reserve Police Battalion 101."...
Read more:




Following Hunthausen there was a steady increase of violence towards gay people in the Church, though not always in the news media, much of it was hidden from the public view, as it was done to me in June 1997. It seemed that as Benedict XVI brought clerics into the curia and the hierarchy their efforts took on a life of its own, ever increasing the violence against gays. In truth, reenacting the same violence that was done to them as children. 

Out Do - Antigay Remarks 
Hierarchy 

In the USA it seemed like one bishop or archbishop, after another were trying to out do each other as to who could be the meanest against gays or make the most outlandish statement against gay people in the news media. This information is all and forever  documented in the news media. It was beyond shameful. Over the years, It promoted ignorance and increased prejudices and hatred of millions of innocent people - worldwide. 
  
This was quite apparent from around 2010 until 2013 when Pope Francis was elected.  The goals like Nazi Germany became increasingly irrational. Burke demonstrated just how irrational it was getting by his public display against the Synod of Bishops on Family 2014 for supporting gay children. 

Without the secrecy and bureaucratic anonymity for Burke and others like him - to hide behind and the increase transparency - Burke’s emotional outbursts, especially regarding the Synod 2014 welcoming gay children makes it clear - that Benedict XVI was not the sole orchestrator of this massive antigay crusade. Benedict XVI started it - but Burke was quite involved, even more involved than Benedict XVI for possibly the past 25 years - in what appears to have created a “cumulative radicalization."

Ian Kershaw
Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany
“Cumulative Radicalization"

Professor Ian Kershaw - “...is regarded by many as one of the world's leading experts on Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany, and is particularly noted for his monumental biography of Hitler... 

In Kershaw's view, what happened in Germany after 1933 was the imposition of Hitler's charismatic authority on top of the "legal-rational" authority system that had existed prior to 1933, leading to a gradual breakdown of any system of ordered authority in Germany. Kershaw argues that by 1938 the German state had been reduced to a hopeless, polycratic shambles of rival agencies all competing with each other to win Hitler's favour, which by that time had become the only source of political legitimacy. Kershaw sees this rivalry as causing the "cumulative radicalization" of Germany, and argues that though Hitler always favoured the most radical solution to any problem, it was German officials themselves who for the most part, in attempting to win the Führer's approval, carried out on their own initiative increasingly "radical" solutions to perceived problems like the "Jewish Question", as opposed to being ordered to do so by Hitler...
Read more:

“So the ‘cumulative radicalization’ so central to nazism is left needing an explanation.

Linked to this is the capacity for destruction — again extraordinary even for dictatorships. This destructive capacity, though present from the outset, developed over time and in phases; against internal political, then increasingly, ‘racial’ enemies in spring 1933, across the spring and summer of 1935, and during the summer and autumn of 1938; following this, the qualitative leap in its extension to the Poles from autumn 1939 onwards; and the unleashing of its full might in the wake of the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. The unceasing radicalization of the regime, and the different stages in the unfolding of its destructive capacity cannot, however, as has come to be generally recognized, be explained by Hitler’s commands and actions alone. Rather, they followed countless initiatives from below, at many different levels of the regime. Invariably, these occurred within a broad ideological framework associated with Hitler’s wishes and intentions. But those initiating the actions were seldom — except in the realms of foreign policy and war strategy — following direct orders from Hitler and were by no means always ideologically motivated. A whole panoply of motives was involved. What motivated the individual — ideological conviction, career advancement, power-lust, sadism and other factors — is, in fact, of secondary importance. Of primary significance is that, whatever the motivation, the actions had the function of working towards the accomplishment of the visionary goals of the regime, embodied in the person of the Führer...
Read more:

This is in no way meant to degrade Benedict XVI or members of the curia and hierarchy, but to understand how the actions of world leaders can effect the lives of children that is then repeated in the future.

A major question is - Who does canon law serve?  Does it serve to protect homophobic biases to avoid the above? And if it does, than it does not serve God’s people. It then leaves the world unprotected open to every form of prejudices and increase ignorance - as it has for the past 30 years. 



__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________



The Wake of Pope Francis
Transparency

A tremendous amount of transparency immediately and automatically followed in the wake of Pope Francis’s state-of-the-art reform process to end the corruption in the Curia. Seemly it was more stunning for some members in the Curia like Cardinal Burke to cognitively comprehend.  Photo

Bureaucratic Anonymity - Down

Burke appeared to be unaware that the shield of bureaucratic anonymity no longer existed and failed to realize that his standard managerial style of emotional outbursts effective behind the scenes - would publicly be disastrous for him. He ended up exposing far more information about himself, his accomplices and the corruption inside the Curia - than he may have realized or intended. This is stated - considering Burke’s endless and explosive verbal outrage - attacking the midterm report from the Synod of Bishops on Family 2014 on protecting gay children and then the leadership of Pope Francis. 

Burke - Intimidating & Autocratic Power - Gone

Burke’s excessive and continual ranting and raving, all began escalating starting at high level of intensity for the better part of 2014. It appeared that Burke was caught off guard and disoriented by the swift effectiveness of the reform of the Vatican Bank. According to news media reports - he then seemed to arrogantly presumed that he held the same degree of autocratic power that he had before Pope Francis arrived on the scene with his diverse reform entourage of colleagues, consultants and experts. 

Burke Demands End - “Open Dialogue”  

Regardless that the curia’s power structure had been significantly altered and that all discretionary funding had been ended - Burke continued in his same domineering modus operandi. This was evident by his unrestrained and irrational demands that Pope Francis be forced to end any “open dialogue” on the issue of divorce and remarried couples receiving communion cease immediately. Within a few months before the Synod 2014 - Burke went so far as having a book written, published and released on the topic of marriage - just before the Bishops began meeting for the Synod 2014 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/18/catholic-bishops-divorce_n_5837916.html). 

This public overexposure of Burke’s irrational and audacious not so veiled omnipotent modus operandi - directly opposing Pope Francis’s insistence on “open dialogue,” in a relatively short period of time - readily exposed familiar and identifiable traits of a distinctive arrogant style that operated flagrantly unimpeded, for several years behind bureaucratic anonymity. 

Burke - Fierce Emotional Outbursts

Burke’s most identifiable trait is his fierce emotional outbursts under the disguised of his misunderstanding of the omnipotence of canon law pervades every curial department, as it did with demanding Pope Francis end any open discussion of topic of divorce and remarriage. From news media accounts, especially the numerous private interviews that Burke arranged to voice his canonical objections to the open discussion of the protection of gay children - he publicly misrepresented this topic as referring to gay marriage. 

Burke’s Criminal Negligence - Synod 2014
Gay Children 

This type of public misrepresentation, by a senior member of the Roman Catholic Church, of the facts regarding the protection of gay children is criminally negligent - a global crime against humanity that Burke will never face any form of civil prosecution. And therefore Burke and his supporters in the curia and in the hierarchy - having absolutely no legal oversight - has allowed this kind of criminal negligence of children to become a standard practice used endlessly by Burke. 

Burke has always used this flagrant disregard of the lives of gay people and now of the lives of gay children - it appears to be a form of hysteria that helps to throw the public focus off the actual - facts of the subject being presented. The topic of protecting gay children growing up is not found anywhere in canon law. Why Cardinal Burke felt the overwhelming apparent need to publicly confused the topic of protecting gay children growing up with the more publicly contentious issue of gay marriage for some - mostly his supporters - was tragic blow to the lives of all children.

On December 7, 2014 - Pope Francis rightly made a pubic clarification that the topic was about the need to support gay children growing up, and that the idea of gay marriage was not even discussed at the Synod 2014:

...Nobody mentioned homosexual marriage at the synod; it did not cross our minds. What we did talk about was of how a family with a homosexual child, whether a son or a daughter, goes about educating that child, how the family bears up, how to help that family to deal with that somewhat unusual situation.
That is to say, the synod addressed the family and the homosexual persons in relation to their families, because we come across this reality all the time in the confessional: a father and a mother whose son or daughter is in that situation. This happened to me several times in Buenos Aires.
We have to find a way to help that father or that mother to stand by their son or daughter...



To be continued: 

Fr Marty Kurylowicz




__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________

____________
____________________________
______________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________
____________
__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________



Background information - 1997 - 2013:

Fr Marty Kurylowicz’s “Coming Out” 1997 
News Reports: 

March 29, 1997 - Parishioners Supportive of Gay Priest “coming out” for the protection of children. 
(check The Grand Rapids Press for accuracy)

June 28, 1997 - Kurylowicz Comes Out 
“...U.S. Catholic Bishops Conference said Kurylowicz” coming out to his congregation, first in a newsletter then from the pulpit on Holy Thursday, is “unprecedented.”
(check The Grand Rapids Press for accuracy)

October 8, 2005 - Impending rules on gay priests creates Catholic divide
…Rev. Martin Kurylowicz...said...the struggle would be made harder for many others if the Vatican issues new rules that reportedly would ban gays from becoming priests… “Kids as young as 4 or 5 know they're different," said Kurylowicz... "They grow up with this pervasive guilt, which sabotages their growth and motivation." The result is thousands of dollars in therapy to accept their natural orientation, he said, adding, "Does the Vatican want to take that on, like the tobacco industry had to take on for the damage it caused consumers?”...
(check The Grand Rapids Press for accuracy)

May 27, 2006 - Gay priest removed from ministry
(check The Grand Rapids Press for accuracy)
Note: Bishop Hurley unethically manipulates canon law misrepresenting my situation: by excluding the factual details of the Vatican’s equally unethical punitive sanctions and threats imposed on me for “coming out” for the protection of children in March 1997, e.g. lost of the possibility of future assignments, regular priest salary and educational benefits, to  coerce my compliance to be reeducated - to assure my silence in protecting children or to force me to leave the priesthood. Hurley’s dishonest response to the press was meant to destroy my credibility and reputation. Hurley also disclosed the cost of my psychotherapy sessions, a breach of employer employee confidentially. There are No USA civil laws to protect gay priests from such a fatal destructive public attack on my reputation. The same tactic was used, again in 2012, against Vatican Bank, ex-president Tedeschi, who was attempting to increase the transparency of the scandal-ridden Vatican institution. There is “…the publication of a letter from a psychotherapist detailing the mental health of the Vatican's recently ousted bank chief…and appeared aimed at further discrediting and humiliating the Vatican bank's ex-president, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, once a top papal adviser…”(http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-06/D9VBK7581.htm
Hurley’s deliberate distortion of the facts of my situation was meant to humiliate me publicly, a character assassination against me. This was not just one single isolated character assassination attack made against me. The exact pattern of this character assassination attack, since 2004 to 2014  has been over used by the Vatican under Benedict XVI - against anyone - deemed as a threat to their specific ideology, especially related to gay sexual orientation. On, April 30, 2014, Cardinal Muller of the CDF, issued a forceful public statement against the LCWR leaders that is confusing and irrationally based on a misrepresentation of unsubstantiated facts. Cardinal Burke during and after the Synod on the Family, October 2014 - fiercely demonstrated by his unwillingness to even discuss issues related marriage and gay sexual orientation, the pervasive hostile attitude against homosexuality. 

__________________________________
_____________________________________________
_______________________________________


March 4, 2008 Children Growing-up Gay & Vatican's Impact Harmful -GROUPTHINK 
Fr. Marty Kurylowicz 

December 26, 2008 - AUSCHWITZ -- CHRISTMAS 2008 -- A flashback far more severe than in --- BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN – Fr. Marty Kurylowicz
Reposting

April 2009 - SEXUAL ORIENTATION is less about sex and more about LOVE, being one with another human being. Attachment Theory - - LOVE & RELIGION --- Fr. Marty Kurylowicz 
Nothing in life is more precious than the intimate relationships we have with love ones. Healthy love relationships delight us give us confidence to take on challenges and support us in difficult times.

December 17, 2009 - Roman Catholic hierarchy child sexual abuse “cover-ups” ordered by Benedict XVI to avoid public outrage & criminal charges falsely accused gay priests, WATERGATE? Fr. Marty Kurylowicz 
  ...A major problem with the hierarchical structure of the Roman Catholic Church is that there are no “checks and balances.” When the necessary “checks and balances” are not in place to protect any organization, it leaves "not making waves" the rule that governs the hierarchy and opens the way to many devastating mistakes harmful to everyone and allows corruption to grow...

__________________________________
_____________________________________________
_______________________________________

July 2010 - The letter sent out by Fr. Marty Kurylowicz to USA government officials and others – a victim of structural violence - for protecting children - seeking legal assistance as a citizen of the USA
(a copy found on the link below)

February 10, 2013 - Fr. Kurylowicz’s letter sent to US government officials and others.
I made an appeal to counteract Bishop Hurley’s manipulation of canon law in order to be able to charge me on a technicality “not returning home” by separating it from the situation that caused it after I came out1997. Letter gives an extensive accounting of my “coming out” situation of 1997 - not separated from Hurley’s charges against me. 


__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________


Additional background links:


Engendering Transgenerational Lines 
of
Violence 


Ghosts in the nursery - Selma Fraiberg, 1975
Brief description:
Ghosts in the nursery is apt descriptor for the "emotional baggage" vulnerabilities parents (and other caregivers) may carry from their own experiences of being parented including conflicted feelings about their parents, a sense of being unsupported in childhood, and traumatizing memories. These ghosts often negatively impact feeding, sleep, toilet training, discipline, and other areas of current parenting abilities by influencing the way parents interpret their infants behavior. Parents with histories of child abuse may find certain aspects of appropriate early childhood development as purposeful acts of threat and aggression...  





Ghosts from the Nursery: Tracing the Roots of Violence - by Robin Karr-Morse and Meredith S Wiley - 2013
Reviewed by Anna Luise Kirkengen, MD, PhD
Excerpt:
...Karr-Morse delineated the undeniable yet unappreciated connection between ghosts in the nursery and ghosts from the nursery when choosing to paraphrase psychoanalyst Selma Fraiberg who... “used the phrase ghosts in the nursery to refer to the tendency of parents to bring to the rearing of their children the unresolved issues of their own childhood.” These ghosts in parents’ pasts cast shadows, informing many parental relationships to their children whereby, certainly unintended, threatening experiences in the parents’ pasts transform into threats to their children’s present. This implies that they are engendering transgenerational lines of suffering and pain, rage and defeat, hatred and aggression, violation and violence.
On the ever more expanding background of social and societal drama resulting from increasing numbers of events of school shootings in the US—and increasingly worldwide—Karr-Morse delineates a complex pattern of lived logic. This pattern is woven of threads we members of affluent societies wish to ignore because they are basically incompatible with our illusion of civilization...
Ghosts from the Nursery: 
Tracing the Roots of Violence 
by Robin Karr-Morse and Meredith S Wiley,
New York, NY: Atlantic Monthly Press; 2013
Read more:
US National Library of Medicine 
National Institutes of Health



Reflections on the Work of Professor Selma Fraiberg 
A Pioneer in the Field of Social Work and Infant Mental Health - Vivian Shapiro - 2007
Excerpt:
...In summary, Selma formulated and investigated hypotheses designed to explain the factors that caused some parents to repeat their own traumatic history with their child, and to raise questions about why some parents, who also had been traumatized did not repeat their history of early trauma. It was more likely, she suggested, that parents who remembered the painful feelings of their childhood, could empathize with their infants, and choose to create a different more positive path of relationships with them. But, those parents who had repressed their feelings of pain and loss had shut off their capacity to feel. They could not empathize with their child. Indeed they had responded to their pain with primitive defense mechanisms of repression and identification with the aggressor and had internalized their parents pathological attachment patterns. They had shut down their feelings of the need for love, but the birth of their dependent infant had reawakened some subliminal feelings within them. However they continued to repress their unacknowledged need for parental empathy and love, and could not respond to their own child’s needs. It was as though the ghosts from the past had risen, and unconsciously these parents built an emotional wall between themselves and their infants...
Read more:
Clin Soc Work J (2009) 37:45–55
Vivian Shapiro, 
Social Work, Private Practice, 
10 Campbelton Circle, 
Princeton, NJ 08540, USA


__________________________________________
________________________________

______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________

____________
____________________________
______________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________
____________
__________________________________________
________________________________
______________________
______
______________________
________________________________
__________________________________________






No comments:

Post a Comment