University of Kentucky
Sharon G. Horne
University of Memphis
Angela D. Miller
University of Kansas
An online survey of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults (N _ 1,552) examined minority stress (I. H. Meyer, 2003) and psychological distress following the 2006 general election in which constitutional amendments to limit marriage to 1 man and 1 woman were on the ballot in 9 states. Following the November election, participants living in states that passed a marriage amendment reported significantly more minority stress (i.e., exposure to negative media messages and negative conversations, negative amendment-related affect, and LGB activism) and higher levels of psychological distress (negative affect, stress, and depressive symptoms) than participants living in the other states. Multiple hierarchical regression analyses revealed significant positive main effects of minority stress factors and state ballot status on psychological distress. In addition, the association between amendment-related affect and psychological distress was significantly higher in states that had passed a marriage amendment compared with other states. Discussion of these findings emphasizes that marriage amendments create an environment associated with negative psychological outcomes for LGB individuals.
Read more:http://old.apa.org/journals/releases/cou-jan09-Rostosky.pdf
© 2009 American Psychological Association
DOI: 10.1037/a0013609
No comments:
Post a Comment